04/26/1990 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

w BOARD OF BUILDING CODE APPEALS APRIL 26, 1990 PAGE 2 variances were required. Mr. Schulz believed that the board should see an engineering plan before approving this request. Mr. Quinn is concerned because he was told that he did not need this in order to get approval to,build on a 45 foot lot. B. Schulz moved to have an engineering drawing submitted showing the drainage plan, seconded by D. Spoerke, and unanimously approved. Mr. and Mrs. Quinn pointed out that they need a definite approval 'or disapproval since they do have a . purchase agreement and they would be released from the contract if there was a disapproval and further stated that they did not want to spend $700.00 for a engineering plan, if the approval to build was not given. J. Kazak moved to rescind the motion to have an engineering drawing submitted showing the drainage plan, seconded by D. Spoerke, and unanimously approved. J. Kazak moved to accept the proposal for the construction of this house on property located between 23066 and 23108 Virginia Ave. The motion died for a lack of a second. J. Kazak moved to deny the construction of this house an property located be- tween 23066 and 23108 Virginia Avenue, seconded by D. Spoerke, and unanimously approved. Request rejected. 2) Mark Laisy, property located between 25780 and 25746 Butternut Ridge Road. Request'permission to move house from 25420 Butternut Ridge to permanent parcel 236-11-3 and 236-11-4. Hearing required Ord. 63-224. (Property to be assembled at Planning Commission April 24, 1990). Also request variance for size of home which is less than 1,500 square feet as required in the "A" Residence District and request variance for width of lot which is less than 80 feet as required in the "A" Residence District. Violations of Section 1334.09 of the building code. (Variance also required by_the Board of Zoning Appeals to be heard on May 2, 1990 if the above permission and variances are granted). Chairman Kazak read the request and administered the oath to Mr. Laisy, his parents, Mr. and Mrs. J. Laisy, and Mr. and Mrs. Scheeff, neighbors. Mr. Kazak questioned if Mr. Laisy was planning to construct an addition in order to make the house conform to the "A" District requirements. Building Commissioner Conway explained that Chapter 1334.09(b) of the Building Code prohibits putting on an a3dition in order to meet the size requirements when a house is being moved. (Please note: agenda states - section 1134.09 and should read 1334.09). Mr. Kazak pointed out that there were other homes on that street which do not meet the size re- quirements. It was also noted that this house was presently on Butternut Ridge in an "A" District. Mr. Schulz and Mr. Scheeff are both concerned that because a vacant 60 foot lot remains, it could be used as a driveway from the proposed apartment complex to Butternut Ridge Road thus putting more traffic on Butternut Ridgee Mr. Schulz suggested combining the two 60 foot lots for this house. Mr. Laisy stated that his grandparents owned the other lot and were not willing to give it up. Mr. Scheeff asked if there was any way to stop them from penetrating the buffer and.. putting a street through to Butternut Ridge. Building Commissioner Conway explained that the Planning Commission has an approved plan which shows no street onto Butternut Ridge Road and the court order states that there is to be no access onto Butternut Ridge. He further clarified that the house is shown at 70 feet setbaek, but they are going to the Board of Zoning Appeals in order to place it 85 feet from.the sidewalk.