02/26/1991 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

? ?. that are directly across and contiguous to those home, dzrectly across frorD. the entrance. on Clague Road (and that includes the 9 homes on Clague that were discussed) and any homes that would be affected by head lights or traffic exiting from the development. I would also like the City Forester to determine the feasibility of moving some mature pine trees that are located at or near the Clague Road entrance to a location better suited for.their buffering of contiguous residents. I ask the developer to present to the Architectural Review Board the revised drawings showirg the club house and pool relocated to the area occupied by Building "G" on the plans and also to detail on his revision a 5 feet board on board rough sawn cedar fence that would run the periphery of the development along the residential properties on Mastick and Clague and, beside that, extending the sidewalks as mentioned by Mr. Skoulis near the dLUnpster locations as applicable. I am also asking the developer to revise his plan to show increased buffering and a fence or other buffer along Brookpark Road and to include in his revisions a detail or protective buffer such as a fence to the playground area. I would also request that a complete lighting plan be included in the plans submitted to the Architectural Board, indicating location, heights, and types of lights to be used in the development and around the play area for that Board's reviewa Also that the City Engineer review the wetland study and the report provided him by Shore West and to include in his review the study that Mr.. Nicola, from the area, . will be providing him and to determine whether or not we are in compliance with federal guideliries for use as a federal wetland or if, in fact, this is a federal wetland: I would also like the revised plan to be sent to the Safety Department for their input. I ask the A.R.B. to be very specific and concerned about the kind of buffering that will be placed along the development and their recommendations will be ta.ken very seriously by the Planning Commission. Also, that as required by City Engineering, the revised plans should show that the culvert is covered and filled in according to Engineering guidelines • Motion was seconded by A. Skoulis, and unanimously approved. Residents were advised that this proposal would go to the Architectural Review Board on March 20, 1991 at 5:30 p.m. and would return to Planning Comm.ission on March 26th, but the neighbors would not be notified. IV. NEW DEVELOPMIIVTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: 1) Carter Plaza West/Best Property Lot Split. The proposal is to subdivide Permanent Parcel No. 232-26-15. (Best Products) into (2) lots, one of which is the site of the proposed Carter Plaza West currently being reviewed by Planning Commission. Location is the north side of Lorain Road between First Federal Savings & Loan and Gastown. Zoning is Retail Business, General, entirely, and the proposal does not confonn to.the Zoning Code Requirement for frontage for either sublot. (Please Note: Variance request was denied by the Board of Zoning Appeals on February 13, 1991.) PROPOSAL HAS BEEDT WITHDRAWN BY THE DEVELOPER. V. COMM[JNICATIONS: No items. VI. COMNLITTEE REPORTS: • 6