Laserfiche WebLink
. .? <br />C?' <br />that they ha.d a problem getting him to agree to all cluster, and considering that <br />the property faces 480 and the property across 480 is industrial. He pointed out <br />that the Cambridge Crossings development next to the freeway is not selling. Mr. <br />Wilkins, an adjacent resident, believed that Hennie Homes should have been <br />present and there should be a conunitment from the developer to stay with the <br />cluster hoine zoning, and questioned if there are any square footage requirements <br />in the Single Cluster Zoning. Councilman D. McKay stated that in the ten years <br />that he has served on Conncil and he has never found any Plaiining Commission <br />member who deliberately prevented anyone from developing his property or made a <br />self centered decisione He pointed out that these members are all volunteers and <br />they must make some very hard decisions and these decisions should not be rushed <br />into. He sympathized-with the church, and at the time of the original re-zoning <br />Council was excited about the community, but it is not fair to say the Commission <br />is deliberately holding up a proposal. Mr. Skoulis stated tha.t this plan is far <br />more pa.latable than the previous one, and he would like to see something like <br />this go through, but he still believed that the Commission should receive a <br />planner's advise. In response to Reverend Kuhn's remarks, he stated that they did <br />get the opinion of a professional planner on the Vista Home proposal. He did not <br />believe it will take that long to get an opinion on this property, after the <br />planner is approved. Mr. Thomas clarified that a planner was not hired to review <br />the zoning of the property for the View Point proposal, he was hired because the <br />Comnission needed information on cluster homes, the impact that a golf comrmun-ity <br />would have on the City, and the structures to be built on the property, the <br />planner was not asked if this were appropriately zoned. Mr. Orlowski believed <br />that this proposal should be delayed until the planning process was in motion. <br />Mr. Morgan stated that delay was not quite the right word, that he would make a <br />motion that once, within a short period of time, that Council has agreed upon the <br />Commission's selection of a master planner that the Commission would take a look <br />at this piece ot property along witn ttie surrour <br />is going to be impacted by surrounding areas or <br />by what is done with this piece of property, so <br />on this one property without looking at the whole <br />try to expedite this as quickly as possible, noi <br />is complete, but will study it and see how it fit <br />frame since it may take some time before a deter <br />impact is going to be. (Members discussed advi <br />hiring the planner.) Mr. Orlowski stated that c <br />Commission will be reviewing a tremendous amount <br />and there is no reason why this covld not be on <br />reviewed at the start and this ma.tter could be de. <br />until the processes of the selection of the exact <br />place since the Conuni.ssion is in accord on wha <br />motion was seconded by L. Orlowski. Mr. Thomas c. <br />the church of any cost of the plarmer. Mr. Grind <br />they would be willing to pay. Mr. Morgan state <br />same thing, the only difference is the time eleme <br />this is a reversal of what occurred in July. He <br />the only member who wanted this proposal to be pa: <br />Mr. Orlowski stated that he was absent at that me, <br />the Commission is a lot further along than they w, <br />to the fact that the Commission is rezoning the <br />stated that they were not rezonin.g anything yet, <br />approving the plan for cluster. He mentioned Sect: <br />aing area Decause znis properLy <br />he other areas will be impacted <br />he Commission cannot just focus <br />area, that the Conunission will <br />delay it Lmtil the master plan <br />s in, again not giving any time <br />nination is made as to what the <br />sing Council of the urgency of <br />uring the planning process the <br />of properties within the City, <br />the top of the list that to be <br />.ayed for a short period of time <br />planner.and the motion can take <br />: should be done on this. The <br />.arified that this would relieve <br />211 stated that, for the record <br />i, that they were both after the <br />zt. Mr. Grindell responded that <br />maintained that Mr. Morgan was <br />-t of the master plan processes. <br />?ting. Mr..Morgan explained that <br />!re then. Mr. Grindell objected <br />golf course. When the members <br />he disagreed because they are <br />on 1139.14 and Mr. Dubelko read