My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/10/1991 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1991
>
1991 Planning Commission
>
12/10/1991 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:31:56 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 5:45:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1991
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
12/10/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
-4 <br />. <br />the Safety Depaxtment previously. Mr. Manfrass.advised that the restaurant would <br />be open seven days a week from 10:00 a.m. to 10 p.m. J. Thomas moved to refer the <br />elevation and final site plan to the Architectural Review Board for their review <br />and to make a recommendation to the A.R.B. that they may want to review their <br />decision on the landscaping on the Brookpark Road side of the building to ask for <br />additional greenery or trees to mask the brick face of the building, or to <br />request that the developer add some additional refinement to that side of the <br />building even though there is no sign permitted. A1so that the developer provide <br />information concerning the i11umi.nation of the canopy and we suggest to the A.R.B <br />that they send the plans back to us without an illuminated canopy, and to <br />encourage the developer to initiate that so that we do not have to require him to <br />eliminate ite Mr. Gorris questioned if both the south and west elevations should <br />be addressedo Mr. Thomas responded that they should be, and questioned if <br />variance would be required to add the canopies where the building is adjacent to <br />the right-of-way. Building Commissioner Conway advised that variances would be <br />necessary because a setback is required. The motion was seconded by A. Skoulis, <br />and tmanimously approved. <br />IV. NEW DEVELOPMIIQTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: <br />Silverdale Road Lot Split and Assembly Plat. <br />The proposal is to split permanent parcel no. 232-27-16, owned by the City of <br />North Olmsted, and to combine each half with the abutting property (permanent <br />parcel nos. 232-27-15 and 232-27-17). Location is the west side of Silverdale <br />Road. Zoning is "B"-Residence, Single, entirely, and the proposal conforms to <br />the Zoning Code Requirements. <br />City Engineer Deichmann explained that the Service Director requested that this <br />plat be prepared since the two adjacent property owners were interested in <br />purchasing the 21.4 foot wide strip of land which will be split in two and <br />combined with the adjacent properties. A storm sewer crosses the parcel, but only <br />an easement would be necessary for that. Mr. Morgan is concerned because sublot <br />35 possibly could be split into two non-conforming lots since there were 2 <br />separate sublot numbers for parcel number 232-27-017. The owners explained that <br />they only get one tax bill and that the house straddles the former property line. <br />After some discussion, it was decided that there originally were 3 buildable <br />sublots, but when the 20 foot strip was deleted, two sublots were combined to <br />form one lot. The members had no problem with the proposal since both lots are <br />conforming. T. Morgan moved to approve the Silverdale Road Lot Split and Assembly <br />Plat to split permanent parcel no. 232.27-16, owned by the City of North Olmsted, <br />and to combine each ha.lf with the abutting property (permanent parcel nos. <br />232-27-15 and 232-27-17), located on the west side of Silverdale Road, seconded <br />by L. Orlowski, and unani.mously approved. <br />V. COMMUNICATIONS: <br />Ord. 91-186. Chairman Gorris advised that this ordinance, sponsored by <br />Councilpersons Bahas and Leonard, is to rezone a parcel from Single Family to <br />General Retail. The lot is on Dover Center Road immediately south of the church, <br />north of a strip center, and across from the new medical building. He pointed out <br />that previously when the owner requested a rezoning, the Planning Commission <br />disapproved it on the basis that this was spot zoning and that there should be a <br />line drawn to stop the retail area. Mr. Thomas believed that the zoning of this <br />property is totally inappropriate now considering that both the home and the <br />church are zoned residential, but the property on the south side and those across <br />2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.