07/10/1991 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r , . Chairman Gomersall called a11 interested parties before the Board. The oath was administered to Mr. Davis, sign contractor. Mr. Gomersall stated this is a repeat of what is on the main sign now. Mr. Davis explained that this portion on the sign will be blacked out so that all the signs would be consistent throughout Ohio. Building Commissioner Conway explained the blacked out area would still be considered as sign area. Mr. Davis presented a picture of the existing sign. He explained that the Money Station, Green Machine, and Cirrus will all be contributing to the sign if they are on it. Mr. Gomersall explained that the City is trying to cut back on the signs, and the members agreed that this is unnecessary. B. Grace moved to grant the request for a 12e6 square foot variance to add insert to pole sign, seconded by T. Restifo. Roll call on motion: Grace and Maloney, yes. Restifo and Gomersall, no. Motion failed to pass. Variance denied. In response to his question, Mr. Davis was advised that one member was absent. 4. Stvlin' Concepts, 29919 Lorain Road. Request for variance (1123.12). Request 6 foot variance (at closest point) into front setback. Violation of Ord. 87-93, Section 1139.04(a). Request temporary variance to use gravel area.for Enployee parking. Violation of Ord. 87-93, Section 1161.10(a). Also request special permit to add to non- conforming building. Special permission required Ord. 87-93, Section 1165.02. Approved by Planning Commission June 25, 1991. Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties before the Board. The oath was administered to Mr. Case, the owner, who explained that he only needed the variance for the gravel for 12 to 18 months at which time he will pave it. He stated that this would be for employee parking only, there would be no in and out traffic in that area. He presented the plans for the renovation and two additions to the existing building which is non-conforming. It was decided to grant the variance for 1 year and then if the paving is not completed, he would have to come back to request another variance. Building Comnissioner Conway explained that the front set back variance was for the overhang an the canopy. J. Maloney moved to grant a variance to Stylin' Concepts, 29919 Lorain Road, for a 6 foot variance (at closest point) into front set back, to also grant a temporary variance to use gravel area for employee parking for a 12 month period; and also to grant the special permit to add to a non-conforming building, seconded by B. Grace, and unanimously approved. Variances and special permit granted. 5. David M. Strieter, 4260 Marquette Blvd. Request for variance (1123.12). Request 6 inch rear yard variance for swinnning pool and 9 foot, 3 inch side yard variance for location of pool equipment. Violation of Ord. 87-93, Section 1135.02-(1). (Please Note: Building permit issued under old code, under the revised code only a S foot 9 inch side yard variance would be required). Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties before the Board.- The oath was administered to Mr. Strieter, Mr. and Mrs. Dziatkowicz, Tom Andrews, neighbors, and a representative of Litehouse Pools. Building Comnissioner Conway advised that this permit was issued tmder the old code which required that the pool equipment had to be 10 feet away from a property line. The new code only states that this equipment cannot be located in a required side yard Mr. Gomersall asked if there were many complaints about Litehouse Pools since he cannot understand how this mistake could happen to a contractor. Mr. Conway stated - 2