05/12/1992 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

lighting at the entrance on Barton Road, and the egress from the Olmsted Township area from Cook Road; all setbacks must conform to the codes for the Cluster District, and that there must be a 50 foot setback from the residential line. Also that the A.R.B. review the entrance area from Barton Road and along that strip to determine what is necessary to buffer that area from the Barton Road residents, and all landscaping including the mounds along I-480; and also all colors and sample materials, etc. These plans are also to be referred to the City Forester to review the site for the existing trees that must be saved; to the Engineering Department for input on drainage and to the Safety Department for their input, seconded by R. Tallon, and unanimously approved. When making the motion it was first stated that the setback must conform to the one and two family codes, but it was clarified that this would not be possible, so it was decided that they could follow the cluster zoning. IV. NEW DEVELOPMIINTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: 1) Great Northern Properties Company Asserlbly Plat and Lot Split. The proposal is to combine and re-subdivide permanent parcel nos. 236-17-04, 236-18-07 236-18-08, 236-18-11, and 236-18-15, into two (2) sublots. Location is the south side of Country Club Blvd. between Great Northern Blvd. and Columbia Road for the entire length. Zoning is Mixed Use, entirely; proposed sublot no. 1 does not conform to area requirements specified in Section 1149.02 of the Zoning Code. Mr. Papandreas, Biskind Development Company, advised that they disagreed with the statement that this subdivision did not conform to area requirements specified in Section 1149.02 of the Zoning Code. He explained that the development area refers to the boundary lines that make up the Mixed Use District, within which there may be a number of parcels and/or owners. He believed that there was a difference between lot area and lot lines. He pointed out that this would be - the same situation as Chester's Restaurant or Pierre Radisson's parcels. City Engineer Deichmann advised that he has discussed this situation with the legal department and no variances would be required. Vice Chaizman Orlowski questioned how the 11 foot strip of land on Country Club Boulevard was to be handled. Mr. Papandreas advised that Biskind was going to retain ownership of that strip of land which will be landscaped in keeping with the rest of the parcel. They are keeping this in anticipation of what they believe will be happening on Country Club Boulevard. Mr. Deichmann stated that they did not need frontage on Country Club. Mr. Papandreas advised that there were no specific plans for the adjacent Service/Restaurant parcel. Vice Chairman Orlowski advised that, as inuch as he likes this particular proposal, he believed that two free standing restaurants is sufficient for this section, and that any other restaurants should be incorporated into a hotel or an office building. He advised that if these buildings are properly integrated and configured they would be an asset to the area and this development, but any other free standing restaurants would be excessive. Mr. Papandreas stated tha.t the service designation could include several othtr types of businesses. Mr. Skoulis noticed that the preliminary plans show the restaurants staggered in the same manner that they are being asked to do now. R. Tallon moved to accept the proposal for the the Great Northern Properties Company Assembly Plat and Lot Split, proposal to combine and re-subdivide permanent parcel nos. 236-17-04, 236-18-07, 236-18-08, 236-18-11, and 236-18-15, into two (2) sublots. Location is the south side of Country Club Blvd. between Great Northern Blvd. and Coliunbia Road for the entire length. Zoning is Mixed Use, entirely, proposed sublot no. 1 does conform to area requirements specified in Section 1149.02 of the Zoning Code, and this approval is conditional upon the owner of proposed sublot 2, granting an easement to the 8