06/09/1992 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr. Kaczmarczyk, builder, Mr. Zarzycki, a'rchitect, and Father Flynn, represented the church. Mr. Kaczmarczyk advised tha.t the Architectural Review Board and the Board of Zoning Appeals had approved the variance. Mr. Thomas noted that one resident did ha.ve some concerns about the parking, but the architect satisfied that issue. Mr. Gorris questioned if the parking was adequate. Building Commissioner Conway advised that he had reviewed the paxking as a non- simultaneous use and it did conform, and the developers ha.ve stated that the hall and the pavilion would not be used at the same time. Mr. Gorris believed tha.t the hall and.the pavilion could be used at the same time. Mr. Za.rzycki stated that they ha.d reviewed this under a simultaneous use and with the new parking there should be no problem since there will be room for over 300 ca.rs, the actual usage of the hall to date ha.s been a max-i mm of 240 people at one time, with 307 cars with 4 people per car they would have room for over 1,000 people. They now have 264 spaces, and will be adding 43 spaces in front of the pavilion. He clarified tha.t there was additional area where parking could be added if it ever became a problem. In reference to security, Mr.. Kaczmarczyk advised that there ha.d never been a vandalism problem, and they did not anticipate one with this building. They did not believe that gates would be necessary. Mr. Thomas pointed out that they are planning some dim lighting. The City forester's report stated "Etrerything looks good in the landscape plan. I would, however, like to see some Red Sunset Maples or Pin Oak trees planted on the North and West sides of the building. Three trees on the North and two on the West side." Ms. Baloug, the adjacent neighbor, was present and advised from the audience that everything was fine. B. Gorris moved to accept the proposed construction of the picnic pavilion on the church property for St. Clarence at 30106 Lorain Road with the° recomnendations of the additional trees as requested by the City Forester, seconded by L. Orlowski, and Imanimously approved. ? 4) Cinnamon Woods (Hennie Homes), Detailed Development Plans, property bounded by rear property lines of homes on - the west side of Barton Road, Interstate 480, and Olmsted Township. Proposal to construct duplex and detaehed homes in Mixed Use "C" District. Heard by Architectural Review Board on Ma.y 20, 1992. Mr. T. Grendell, attomey, advised that they were now seeking final approval of the detailed development plans for the proposal to construct 214 single family attached and detached imits on 56 acres off Barton Road. The Architectural Board ha.d approved the proposal as far as materials, lighting, signage, and did make suggestions pertaining to landscaping. They do intend to work with the city arborist on a phase to pha.se basis to identify trees which are to be saved, as well as replanting additional trees to replace any which must be removed. There will be mounding and landscaping to buffer from I-480 and trees in that area will also be saved as well as those adjacent to the Ba.rton Road properties. He clarified that this will be a condomiru.umized property and there will be no subdivision plat, but the detailed development plan must be approved. The members questioned whether or not a subdivision plat was necessary. Mr. ;Grendell advised that the condominiinn concept as to the use of the property is governed.by State law, not by zoninro codes. This is somewhat different than most since it is a lateral condominium wherein the owner would own the unit and all the property within the boundary of the site would be eomnon area or limited comanon area, such as the driveway for each Lmit, and the maintenance of the common areas is the responsibility of the condominitnn association. Mr. Grendell advised tha.t they are dealing with the owner of the one existing tmit in order to either purcha.se it or re-face the building so that it will become part of.the overall plan. The main