07/28/1992 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

a - carriers pick up the papers and at the rear loading dock where the papers are delivered. The lights will be white high pressure sodiLUn and directed down. In response to the neighbors' questions (the speakers did not identify themselves and asked'questions fran the floor), he advised that the building is on the first sublot in5ide the Industrial Park, that it will be only 1 story high, and set back approximately 130 feet, and that several trees will be left in the front setback. R. Bowen moved to forward the Plain Dealer Publishing Company proposal to construct a building on Sublot 2, North Olmsted Industrial Park to the Architectural Board of Review, the Safety Department, and the forester, and to ask the developer to present pictures of other such facilities that they ha,ve constructed to the Architectural Review Board and return them to the Planning Commission, seconded by B. Gorris, and lmanimously approved. The members decided to hear the subdivision plat at this time. IV. NEJ DEVEL,OPMIIVTS ANID SUBDNISIONS :(Heard at this point ). 2) North Olmsted Industrial Park Resubdivision. The proposal is to resubdivide sublot 2A (permanent parcel 234-9-4) of a previously recordeci' subdivision (voltune 248, page 31 of Cuyahoga County Ma.p Records) into two (2) sublots plus a rPninant non-conforming "Block A". Parcel adjacent to the entry of the Industrial Parkway. Zoning is Limited Industry-Industrial Park, entirely, and the two (2) proposed sublots conform to the Zoning Code requirements. Mr. Chomoa, engineer, explained that'the proposed sublot 8 eonformed to code with 250 foot frontage and min;m„m area of 2 acres. The remaining sublot 9 will also conform. ChaiT-man Gorris questioned why Block "A" was remainino as a non- confoxming lot along the entrance. Mr. Ghomoa stated that the developer w:ill agree to attach block "A" to this sublot provided that, if they ever have an opportunity to buy the parcel to the west, they could be assured that they could have a curb cut. Mr. Thomas pointed aut that the Commission could not approve rh;G subd.ivision if it contained a non7-conforming lot. After some discussion it was determined that a curb cut would have to be 100 feet from an intersection so conceptually there would be no problem:installing a drive to this property. It was decided that- the plans eould be noted to show the removal of the line between sublot 8 and block "A" so that the prvposal could be approved this evening. J. Thomas moved to approve the North Olmsted Industrial Park Resubdivision to resubdivide sublot 2A (permanent Parcel 234-9-4) to create two parcels, sublot 8 and 9, with the condition that block „ W' will not remain a separate lot and will be attaehed to sublot 8 as noted on the plans, seconded by L. Orlowski,. and unan;mously approved. III. BUILDIlNG DEPARTTENr .RE(2?ITESTS (resiuned) : 3) Szarka's.Restaurant, 29691 Lorain Road Proposal to construct an addition. Carried over from meeting of July 14th which was cancelled. Mr. Ingrassia, developer, presented the plans and explained that the restaurant is being .sold and the 20 by 30 foot addition. must be constructed prior to the sale in order to re3oca.te the rest room facilities to the first floor and to include an entrance area. The seating will lie reduced from 90 to 72. The addition is on a. separate parcel, however an assembly- plat for the two lots has been .- subnitted: A,new. wood trash enclosure will be constructed and will match.the sidiuig on the add.Ytion. Builcling Commissioner Coriway advised that no loading zone :. is required for this size building; that the parking as shown does conform;- the.:_ , landsca.ping buffers do not conform to the present code, and no additional . 2