Laserfiche WebLink
that marketing concept used by Wal-Mart is usually to build a Sam's Club, in the <br />same vicinity. The members agreed that there was little they could do to <br />prevent the development, basically, they would have to be concerned about <br />minimizing the negative impact on the city. The Wal-Mart plans were given to <br />C.P.C. for their recommendations on buffering, traffic control, etc. It was <br />pointed out that parcels 26 and 27 are landlocked, however access might be <br />possible through Olmsted Township for cluster housing, so it was decided these <br />parcels should remain zoned as is for the present. Parcel 28 has been rezoned to <br />Single Family Cluster for the approved Viewpoint proposal. Parcel 31 is the site <br />of the approved Moen Office Building and 32 is under construction for the <br />Butternut Ridge Apartments; both of these parcels were approved as specified <br />under a court judgement. It was suggested that parcel 33 across from the Moen <br />parcel would be best suited to an office use, but it was too small. Mr. Dubelko <br />advised that, because a Single Family zoning would not be appropriate, it should <br />be rezoned to conform with the remainder of the area, and a variance could always <br />be requested to develop it. Regarding parcel 35, the rear portion of the <br />recreation center, C.P.C. suggested that it be rezoned for senior citizen or <br />cluster housing. Mr. Tallon advised that this property had some drainage problems <br />and might also be needed for expansion of the recreation center and should remain <br />as zoned. It was noted that there were some walking trails there. C.P.C. had <br />recommended that parcel 37 be rezoned to Mixed Use, since the office market is <br />slow and Mixed Use is more flexible. Mr. Skoulis stated that the residents in the <br />area had worked with the owner and the city to formulate a satisfactory office <br />building district for that parcel and he believed that this should remain as is. <br />If in the future a developer presented another type proposal which would a <br />rezoning, the Planning Commission and Council would have more control over the <br />property. Parcels 38, 39, 40 and 41 are all part of Focus Area A and should be <br />considered with it. Parcel 47 is the site of a possible entrance ramp for I-480 <br />west bound traffic. Parcel 49, owned by the State of Ohio, would be a good site <br />for a parko Parcel 50 was is the site of the proposed A Stone's Throw Apartment <br />Complex and does contain some wetlands. County P1arLning recommended parcel 51 for <br />senior housing or open space, and the members agreed that Multiple Residence <br />would be acceptable. The above suggestions will be studied and reviewed for the <br />next meeting. Mr. Dubelko cautioned that when zoning changes are proposed, an <br />overall zoning plan shduld be proposed for an entire area, parcels should not be <br />spot zoned. <br />IX. ADJOURNMQQT: <br />The meeting was adjourned at 10:15 p.m. <br />c ^ ? <br />, Chairman <br />Oring, <br />3