10/27/1992 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

b• '. . f the ordinance takes effect. Mr. Tallon suggested that the commercial owners could be notified now and then again shortly before unless this is cost prohibitive. Mr. Thomas suggested that perhaps the Illuminating Company could put some kind of notice in their bills. B. Gorris moved to approve Ordinance number 92-102 and Ordinance riumber 92-1031 seconded by K. 0'Rourke, and imanimously approved. The members discussed two minor changes: the 01ive Garden is requesting to enclose an area to store bread racks; and North Olmsted Home Care is requesting a shed 40 feet behind theix addition. It was decided that there were no problems with these requests and they could be handled by the Building Department. In regard to the rough draft of the Master Plan which has been distributed to the members, Mr. Thomas is concerned since some of the recommended rezoning on the west end of the city would appear to be spot zoning. Mr. Tallon agreed that the entire area was to be rezoned to Mixed Use "D", and the map only shows 3 parcels rezoned to that classification. The members decided to discuss the plan without County Planning at the next meeting, November 10th at 7:00 and formulate questions which will be discussed with CPC later. Chairman Gorris asked the Law Department to review the August 11, 1992 letter to Mayor Boyle from the Ohio Department of Transportation regarding the access drives onto Great Northern Boulevard from the Developers Diversified property for compliance to the journal entry. City Engineer Deichmarm advised that the Butternut Ridge Apartment drive is being corrected so that it conforms to the agreement between O.D.O.T. and Developers Diversified, and O.D.O.T. has consented to the Moen driveway. Mra Gorris expressed his regrets that Mr. Bowen is resigning from the Commission and thanked him for his service. In reference to Nightfall, Assistant Law Director Dubelko stated tha.t a resident has advised him that there have been noise problems with the new owners and there is some debris an the property. He has been contacted by the new owners' attorney who indicated this issue might have to be settled in court. He is believed that the courts might allow them to pave the property as ordered originally as long as there was assurance that the codes would be followed for the buffering. Mr. Tallon received a call from one of the owners of the business who assured him that if there were any problems he would handle them inunediately. Mr. Thomas believed that the adjacent residents should be notified that there are going to be changes. Mr. Tallon stated that the major concern was just that they would pave the lot without installing the landscaping. It was suggested that some kind of performance bond could be required. IX. ADJOURNMIIQT: B. Gorris moved to excuse the absence of L. Orlowski,'seconded by R. Bowen, and unanimously approved. The meeting was adjourned at 9:15 p.m. , Chairman B. Oring, 4 ?.? --