10/26/1993 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

' n --> i47, in compliance with the code; it is our understanding that the 250 watt metal halide luminaire fixture at the south end of the property is being removed; also the dumpster screening will be 6 feet high; the canopy will not be back lit and a directional sign will be installed at the eastern most exit indicating that traffic egressing this property will not bloek the intersection and we are requesting that Mr. Larry Griffith meet.with Captain Ruple prior to this going to the B.Z.D. Committee a written report as it relates to their safety coneerns regarding this intersection. Also all the recomnendations of the Architectural Review Board including the landscape recorrmendations of Mr. Zergott are to be included in this approval, seeonded by R. Tallon. Roll call on motion: Gorris, Tallon, Orlowski, 0'Rourke, and Skoulis, yes. Mr. Thoma.s abstained. Motion carried. During the framing of the motion it was re-stated that the sign would have to return to the Arch-itectural Board. II. REVIF,W AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES: (Heard at this point.) In the minutes of September 14th, page 11, forth line down reads about 5 meetings, it should state several meetings. Also on page 10, 17th line down, remove both words the, should read, In reference to requiring a site plan. B. Gorris moved to approve the September 14, 1993 minutes as corrected, seconded by K. 0'Rourke. Roll ca,ll on motion: Gorris, 0'Rourke, Skoulis, Tallon, and Thomas, yes. Mr. Orlowski, no. L. Orlowski moved-to approve the minutes of September 28, 1993, seconded by K. 0'Rourke, and unanimously approved-. L. Orlowski moved to approve the minutes of October 4, 1993, seconded by K. 0'Rourke, arxl unanimously approved. In the minutes of October 12, 1993, Mr. Gorris asked that on page 1, the Mayor's statement eleven lines up from the bottom, the name Rustom Korie should be deleted althoiigh the name was in the press release, it was not stated at the meeting. L. Orlowski moved to approve October 12, 1993 minutes as amended, seconded by B. Gorris, and unanimously approved. At this point Mr. Benik asked what was approved for-the minutes of September 14, 1993 and questioned if the comiiients of Mr. Lima were removed. Mr. Gorris stated that they were left in. Mr. Orlowski clarified that the members came to a consensus as to how the mi.nutes should read and the way the minutes read as currently printed will be slightly changed. Mr. Benik stated that he would like it noted on the record that he does not believe that the minutes were slightly changed, they are being changed entirely. He thinks that what Mr. Lima said at the September 14th meeting was very relevant to the manner in which this Comnission is chaired and vice chaired. He believed that those comments should be included as well as his statements of this October 26th meeting. Mr. Orlowski thanked Mr. Benik for his input. V. COMMUNICATIONS: (Heard later in the meeting.) VI. CONIMITTEE REPORTS: No items. VII. OLD BUSINESS: (Heard at this point). The members discussed the revised INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING FOR TEIE CITY OF NORTi OLMSTID PLANNING COMNIISSION. Mr. Thomas questioned the 12,000 squaxe foot limitation. It was clarified that the code specified that 12,000 square feet is the point where a development is considered a large development. Mr. Orlowski disagreed with using this as a miniTmum as well as the 2 foot change in grade. He believed that a 2 foot change in grade in some areas where the grade drops 6