07/12/1994 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED PLANNING CONIlVIISSION MNUTES - J[TLY 12, 1994 I. ROLL CALL: ChairnLan Gorris called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m Present: P. Miller, L. Orlowski, R. Tallon, J. Thomas, and B. Gorris. Absent: D. Alston and K O'Rourke Also Present: Assistant Law Director Dubelko, City Engineer Deichmann, Building Commissioner Conway, and Clerk of Commissions Oring. II. REVIEW AND CORRECTION. OF MINUTES: J. Thomas moved to approve the minutes of 7une 28, 1994 as presented, seconded by P. Miller, and unanimously approved. III. BUII.,DING DEPARTMENT REQUESTS: 1) Boston Chicken, 26440 Lorain Road. Proposal to construct building and co-develop with the adjacent building to the east. Heard by Board of Zoning Appeals on July 7, 1994. Mr. Landru and Mr. Krekus, representing Boston Chicken, presented the revised plans for the co- development of the two build.iugs along with a rendering of both buildings. They will be painting the existing brick bu.ilding to match the prototype Boston Chicken building. The bottom half of the new building will be split face block, with Dryvit above, the two bands around the building will be either Dryvit or painted onto the block. The window and door frames will be black, with striped awnings over the windows and doors. The adjacent dark, brown, brick bu.ilding will be painted the same gray, but all signage will remain as is. Mr. Thomas advised the developers that the Commission has traditionally not permitted back lit awnings and any awning must be opaque. Mr. Krekus stated that they do have alternative awnings in cloth or vinyl that can be illuminated with exterior lights. Mr. Tallon is concerned about painting both the block and the brick on the existing building. Mr. Krekus explained that they usually use a latex paint over the brick, and if any spalling occurs, they would have to rectify it. Mr. Landru clarified that they will be painting the adjacent bu.ilding, but if they do not own it, , and it spalled after the guarantee expired, the owners would be responsible for the upkeep. He explained that it is inaportant to keep this color scheme which is their national image and clarified that they would have painted the former building, had they used it. Mr. Krekus stated that the old brick is quite porous and it will be painted to Glidden specifications since they are using their paint. Mr. Orlowski asked that they take the color numbers to the Architectural Board, and also suggested that the mute the red, similar to what was done on Rally's. It was noted that the colors were listed on the plan and the developers presented a color board showing the red. Mr. Tallon would like them to present a` specifications from Glidden stating the type of paint that should be used. Mr. Krekus explained to Mr. Orlowski the waterproofing they used on the walls. Mr. Orlowski also questioned where the existing dumpsters would be relocated, since they are located in the proposed driveway. Mr. Landru stated that they would probably move them to the side. Mr. Orlowski would like them screened if they are moved. Mr. Krekus stated that normally there own dumpsters have a masonry