Laserfiche WebLink
c <br />? -•.? . <br />requirements. Page 4 shows a detailed plan of the canopy, scored paving, masonry pavers, and <br />planters along with some outdoor seating areas (uiainly adjacent to store "A") and also shows <br />details of two entry drives along with the proposed landscaping which highlights the entries. Page <br />5 shows the 64 square foot pylon sign which will identify the tenants and the configuration of the <br />main entrance drive with its landscaping. He explained that the parapets will be 26 feet high and <br />the feature canopies will project up to 30 feet, and all pole lights will be 25 feet high. The exterior <br />elevations will be in warm colors of tan /buff and brown or rust, each of the towers will be <br />topped with Lucabond, a durable, metal sandwich panel, for accent, along with Specter Glaze <br />accents, and the roof will be a patina green. In the rear, loading areas will be screened with <br />masonry walls, all utility service will be underground, the only lighting will be cut-off fixtures and <br />the height of the rear elevation will be 19 foot, 8 inches, because of the pitch of the roof. The . <br />booklet also included an aerial photograph and pictures of the site, along with pictures of, <br />surrounding properties, and a preliminary grading plan, which giviug a general idea of floor__ <br />elevations of the project, the type of drainage on site and its relationship to the surrounding._ <br />infrastructure and properties. The photometric report shows that there will be a good distribution <br />of light based on the 25 foot high light level with an average foot candle level of approximately 2... <br />foot candles across the board giving an even d.istnbution of light through out the project. This.__ <br />traffic study was conducted by Euthenics, Inc. and there was a previous study by Traff-Pro for a <br />deep discount superstore. He explained there are distinctions made by the International Society <br />of Eugineers (I.S:E.) between various types of uses and the kind of trip generation that is the <br />result of each. The first report for this project was based on a 185, 000 regional shopping center <br />similar to Great Northern Shopping Center with a variety of tenants. The results of that survey <br />based on 185,00 square foot regional center were identical to the one done for the 155,000 square <br />foot discount superstore retailer in spite of the difference in the square footage. As a result of that <br />study, tlus project was reduced by 12,000 square feet to reduce it to the present 173, 900 square <br />feet aud the focus was changed from a regional shopping center to a neighbor shopping center. In <br />response to Mr. Thomas's questions, Mr. Conway advised that the maximum lot coverage <br />allowed was 25% and this center at 173,900 was just under that coverage. Mr. Thomas noted that <br />this was over 24% coverage and beyond that 25%, they would have needed a variance so he took <br />exception to the continued reference to down sizing. Mr. Papandreas responded that there would <br />have been a greater amount of land in that proposal, and they have reduced both the square <br />footage and the amount of land to be acquired. He believed that, more inaportantly, they re- <br />focused the project from a regional type shopping to this category style neighborhood center with <br />much lower volume type tenants. He was tryiug to distinguish between the regional type center <br />and this neighborhood type one with 4 or 5 tenants that deal with in a particular type of category <br />within the retail market. They now have a signed lease with a sporting goods store, a 40,000 <br />square foot home appliance and electronic store, and are negotiating with another tenant <br />origiually connected with McDonald's but, because this is in the process of being sold, they are <br />not sure of the status of those negotiations; there is a third which he is not a liberty to discuss, but <br />all of them are category type retailers that specialize in a very narrow market niche. He clarified <br />that as a result of the marketing approach that they took, they were more destination orientated <br />and by the statistics identified by the I. S.E. were qualified as general merchandise stores and had a <br />lower traffic generation count. Further they had a much higher storage to sales area ratio, there <br />was 25% storage to sales ratio versus the 10 or 15% that existed for a superstore discount <br />retailer. The average deliveries to the two stores planned for the center are 4 or 5 truck deliveries <br />per week, as opposed to one truck delivery per day or up to 1 per hour for the super store. These <br />issues make a significaut difference between the superstore retailer and the category type <br />2