Laserfiche WebLink
:, . <br />, . <br />? s <br />.? <br />lighting with minimum lighting for security and all lighting maintained at zero foot candles at the <br />property line; and also showing dimensions of the canopy Mr. Koeth would like to see a picture of one. <br />of the rooms. R. Tallon moved to table the Homestead Village Hotel proposal until the next available <br />meeting in order to have the revised prints as recommended, with the new prints indicating size and <br />number of the rooms; driveways conforming to code; with signs conformimg to ordinance; lighting <br />shown on the print; the extension of the canopy detailed on the prints; and a picture of the standard <br />room. The motion was seconded by D. Cameron Alston. Roll call on motion: Tallon, Cameron Alston, <br />Koeth, and Manning yes. Mr. Herbster abstained. Motion carried. Mr. Herbster arrived during the <br />above discussion. <br />2) Studio Plus, proposal to construct a hotel; location is located.on the south side of <br />Country Club Boulevard, east of Victoria Plaza Apartments. <br />Heard by plauuing commission July 23, 1996. <br />Heard by board of zoning appeals August 8, 1996. <br />WITHDRAWN FROM AGENDA, TABLED BY ARCHITECTURAI. REVIEW BOARD <br />SEPTEMBER 17, 1996. <br />Chairman Tallon called a short recess at this time. <br />N. NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: <br />1) Great Northern Properties Rezoning Request. <br />This proposal is to re-zone approximately 25 acres of land located along the north side of Brookpark <br />Road between C.olumbia Road and Great Northern Boulevard, from the existing zoning of Office <br />Building District, to General Retail Business District. <br />(Please note: approximately 2 minutes of the beginning of this discussion was erased from the tape, <br />possibly when a representative of Great Northern Properties was making a copy.) Mr. Richardson, <br />Brookpark Land Incorporated, was giving a backgrbund of Forest City Enterprises, the parent company <br />of Brookpark Land, Incorporated, and their involvement in the restoration of Cleveland area and <br />surroundiug communities. He maintained that it was important that all communities around Cleveland <br />work together to make the greater Cleveland area a better place to live. When his company looks at an <br />investment, they consider, not only what it will do for the company, but what. the investment will do for <br />the community. He believed that this is a good project for this community, and if the city rejects Home <br />Depot and these other quality retailers, it will be sending the wrong signal to retail business, and <br />showing that North Olmsted no longer wants to be a major retailing center and the new stores will go <br />elsewhere, taking their jobs and tax dollars with them, The.y have had numerous stizdies done by many <br />consultants and are going to share that information with the comanission. They will be discussing the <br />following: the greater Cleveland office and retail markets; the North Olmsted office and retail markets; <br />economic benefits from the project; traffic impact of office versus retail; retail site layout compared to <br />office; buffer zoning; impact on the neighborhood; and site lines of the development. They will give a <br />video presentation at the end of the discussion that will actually show the difference between the impact <br />of an office complex and a retail development on the residential area. He gave a brief summary of the <br />biographies of their various consultants. David Hart, president of D. B. Hart, Inc., plamvng and <br />development consultants in Cleveland who is an architect and has a master's in city planning; and <br />Robert Hill, president of Robert Hill, Inc., a community plauning and landscaping architectural firm, <br />who formerly did zoning code updates for North Olmsted. The following consultants conducted a <br />seminar in North Olmsted recently, Christopher Lindberger, managing director and co-owner of Robert <br />S' <br />3