04/17/1996 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

sometlung else in the city. Mr. Conway advised that if a variance is granted, he would like it only to _ pertain to the current use, not a subsequent use. R Gomersall moved to approve the use variance because of practical difficulties and unnecessary hardship (buildings are constructed). To grant a variance to use property zoned as Single Family "C", Residential, for a commercial use. Also to grant a 30 foot variance for side yard set back on east; a 45 foot variance for side yard set back on west and a 3 foot variance for rear yard setback on north. Also to grant a 16.5 % variance for land area to be occupied by buildings (25% allowed, 41.5% requested). Violation of Ord. 90-125, Sections 1123.12; 1135.01; 1139.07; and 1139.05. The above variances are granted with the following conditions: that an approved storm drainage and retention system be installed; that a 4 foot mound with a 6 foot fence with evergreens on either side of it be installed on the north boundary of the property; that a 6 foot board on board fence should be installed on the east and west lines starting from the permauent structures back to the back line; that the litigation currently pending before common pleas court will be resolved to the satisfaction of the North Olmsted Law Department; that corrections necessary to bring the buildings into building code compliance be completed; and also that the use variance that is granted is only granted so long as the property is used for its curreut use, namely storage units. This variance has been mutually agreed upon with the applicant. The motion was seconded by J. Maloney. Roll on motion: Gomersall, Maloney, Koberna, and Purper, yes. Ms. Boyle, no. Motion carried. Variances granted. The members would like the especially long variance requests separated by lines on the agenda, so that it is easier to follow each segment of the request. The meeting was adjourned at 10:00 p.m. R. Gomersall, Chauman od B. Oring, Clerk of Gommissions 9