07/11/1996 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

J. Maloney moved to grant the mutually agreed upon amended proposal of Ron Wagner, 4324 Root Road. for a 37 square foot variance to construct shed which exceeds the permitted 2% coverage of the rear yard. Also, request 5 foot rear yard variance for location of shed_ Violation of Ord. 90-125, Sections 1135.02 (d-1) and (d-4). The motion was seconded by T. Koberna and unaniinously approved. Variances granted. 14. James Reese, 5991 Coluinbia Rd. Request for variance (1123.12). Request a 38 foot front setback variance to build a garage in front setback. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.06 (a). Request an 8 foot height variance for garage. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02 (c-1). Chau-inan Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Mr. Reese, Mrs. Reese, Mr. Pascura, Mrs. Pascura, and Mr. Champa. Mrs. Pascura explained, in order to avoid the cliff, they would like to ainend the request and move the garage 10 foot forward (up to the dotted liue shown on the plan). Mr. Gomersall clarified that the old garage will be demolished and a uew garage will be built 10 feet fi-om the present locatiou. The neighbois had no problem with the request. Nli-. Kobema noted that there is only 12 feet from the proposed line to the property liue, wluch is uot enough length for a car. He suggested that for theu• own safety aud insurauce puiposes, the garage be moved back at least one car length (17 feet). Mr. Gomersall and Mr. Koberna thought 12 feet was sufficient. The meinbers came to a consensus that the garage be located 15 feet from the property line, and it was clarified this would allow the garage to be inoved 7 feet back fi-om the present location (rather than 10 feet). J. Maloney moved to grant the proposal of James Reese, 5991 Columbia Rd., an amended request for a 35 foot fi-out setback variauce to build a garage in frout setback. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.06 (a). Also for an 8 foot height variance for garage. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02 (o-l). The motiov was seconded by R. Gomersall and uuauimously approved. Variances granted. 15. Sig!is by Lisa, 27709 Lorain Rd. Request for variance (1123.12). Request variance to have second wall sigu. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1 163. ] 2(a). Chau-inan Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was admuustered to Mr. Santoi-o. Tlie members clarified the request is for a second wall sign. Noue of the members objected, and uoue of tlie ueighbors caine before the board. M. Boyle moved to grant the proposal of Signs by Lisa, 27709 Lorain Road, for a variance to have a second wall sigii. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1163.12(a). The inotion was seconded by T. Kobema aiid. uuanimously approved. Variauce granted. 16. E. & L. Schulte, 5514 Columbia Road. Request for variance (1123.12). Request_a 4 foot variauce to build an addition 11 feet from the existiug detached garage. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02 (c-2). Chau-man Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was adininistered to Mr. Shulte, owuer. Chauman Gomersallexplained, for safety reasons, t3us board will requu-e a fue proof wall be iustalled on the inside of the garage. Assistant Building Commissioner Rymarczyk clarified the portion of the roof on the rafter, witlun the fifteen feet, would also have to be drywalled. 7