My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/11/1997 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1997
>
1997 Planning Commission
>
02/11/1997 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:33:33 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 9:29:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1997
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
2/11/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
the customer does have that choice. When a quality merchant is introduced into a community, even if <br />they unfomanately drive out some conaperition, the fact of the matter is that the community is ultimately <br />healthier for the better quality of service and product. Mr. Cahill and the audience disagreed. (The <br />developer went on talking but it was not audible.) He stated that there are other issues to be dealt with <br />which they are hearing about tonight and they will be addressing those too (not completely audible). Mr. <br />Cahill stated that there are about four really good hardware stores in this area; Ingersoll's, Coleman, and <br />couple more including Sears. These people have been around for 30 or 40 years. He stated that <br />Ingersoll's moved to North Olmsted about 10 years ago, and are doing a good business, eveiything is <br />reasonably priced, they handle things that other stores do not carry. They have personalized service <br />which a customer will not get in a big store. In any of these large development stores, the people are not <br />kuowledgeable about their products, it drives the professional out of his mind, since a clerk says "Lets <br />check the back of the can, and then we can read it together". People do not want that. ( Several people <br />were tallcing at one time). Chairman Tallon asked that they keep the questions to the point at hand, they <br />should not be discussing whether this clerk is better than that clerk. Keep the discussion to the rezoning. <br />Regarding the ownership of the bu.ilding, Mr. Cahill stated that he was told that the bu.ilding would be a <br />company asset, but he noted that when a company went "belly up", the building would be a company <br />write-off, so it is not a strong point to say that they are going to own the building. That will not make it <br />any better than somebody else does. One of the developers responded that this is still an asset, it would <br />still have a value in the market place, it might not the original intended putpose for the bu.ilding, but <br />there would be a re-use for that facility. Mr. Cahill responded that the re-use would be by somebody <br />else, if by chance, it was sold to some body else. Home Depot would not put another "build.iug" in their <br />own building. The developer responded that Wal-Mart which has about 100 and something million <br />square feet of retail space around the United States and we talk about gigantic numbers, it is important <br />to note that they have about 12 million square feet of space that is vacant and that is down from 16 or <br />18 million square feet. They are always trying to re-deploy their assets, so when they move out of an <br />8,000 square foot store and consolidate with a 10,000 square foot store, the store they leave behind -is <br />an asset that they are going to exploit. He attended a meeting where the vice president of real estate <br />board of Wal-Mart explained the process, explained the strategy, and said it was a corporate goal to re- <br />deploy all assets that are no longer being used for the main retail thrust. Home Depot is the same kind <br />of corporation, they will not waste an asset. W. Cahill stated that he wanted to make the point that he <br />was against this store going into the entire City of North Olmsted. Ms. K. Collins, who had spoken before, had some questions. She noted that the developers had <br />mentioned the programs for employees, and that they do not pay minimum wage. She asked what this <br />store is going to do for her and her neighbors, other than being an eyesore, causmg more traffic, and <br />tearing up the roads, which have not been kept up since Wal Mart was bu.ilt. What were they going to <br />do to make her living environment more pleasant than it, is. One of the developers stated that he did not <br />work for Home Depot so he could not answer that. Chairman Tallon stated that these are hired experts, <br />in their own fields. <br />Mrs. Schuler, a member of Colebrook Condominium Association, stated that their whole street was <br />against this. She stated that their whole area has been abused by retaiL She stated that they are right <br />next to Wal Mart and* are enduring vandalism. Retail brings in vandalism They have just had to put in a <br />$5,000.00 fence. They had fought for the brick wall that was installed between Wa1 Mart and their <br />property, which helped as far as looks, but because the whole area was cleared they have gangs of kids <br />running through their area from Brookpark to Country Club Boulevard. The fence was installed because <br />it was a dangerous situation. Now they are breaking the gas lights that are their only illumination, so <br />they are now considering installing electric lights on the top of the building and removing the beautiful <br />12
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.