My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/11/1997 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1997
>
1997 Planning Commission
>
02/11/1997 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:33:33 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 9:29:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1997
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
2/11/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Olmsted resident, almost eight times the national average. Based on these figures, she believed that <br />North Olmsted has reached the saturation point of retail space, and should never rezone any more land <br />to retail space just so someone can make more money. She explained that a neighbor drove around the <br />city and wrote down the addresses of 43 empty stores at Christma.s, the busiest time of the retail season. <br />According to Crain's Cleveland Business, the retail vacancy rate climbed from 7% to 9% when U. S. <br />Merchandise, Best Products, and Handy Andy closed their doors. She questioned if a"big box" comes <br />in, how many other stores will go out of business and aLso questioned what would happen if a big box <br />went out of business. When these representatives mentioned that they could not justify office building <br />on this parcel, she remembered that one month after the Westlake denied rezoning for the Promenade, <br />another developer planned to build a large office building on Crocker Road across from the property <br />that was to be rezoned. Mr. Gable, who developed River Terrace Office Building in Rocky River, stated <br />that once his building went up, several more followed. He was quoted as saying "If you build it, they <br />will come". She asked that the commission remember the numbers she has quoted and stated that <br />enough is enough. <br />Mr. Coyne, attorney, asked for a point of order and stated that the reason they assembled this team of <br />two of the best city planners in northeast Ohio and the best property economist in Ohio was to answer <br />questions frankly, that the commission and citizens had raised at the last meeting, a lot of which were <br />very good questions. At the end of the last meeting the members were ready to take a vote, when he <br />asked them not to rush to judgment, to keep an open mind, and give them an opportunity to respond to <br />the comments, questions, and criticisms that were made. So that is why they were back here today, they <br />copied the Wall Street Journal article after they heard it at the last meeting, but they heard it again it <br />tonight. They heard the Crain's article at the last meeting, it was heard again. He wants to understand <br />where this is going. They have experts to answer questions from both the commission and the audience. <br />that what they were here for, but if everything that was presented at the last meeting is going to be, <br />reiterated (The members of the audience objected to these statements). Chairman Tallon asked to give <br />everyone'-the courtesy to speak, and he would take care of it. Mr. Coyne stated that tliis is more of a <br />question, he is not saying not to speak, he was telling what was the understanding at the last meeting. <br />His client pays taxes too. They had been given a clear dictate from the commission to respond to the <br />questions that were made previously, and they have had no give or take as to what had been given this ., <br />evening and they had listened to their comments at the last meeting. They are here for the give and take, <br />and ifthe residents want to come up and repeat what was said at the last meeting, that is fine, but that is <br />not what he understood was why they were here tonight. - <br />Mr. Tallon responded that number one: at any meeting there is always auaience participation, and that <br />participation is governed by what takes place at -this meeting. They had their time, they got their <br />commercials in and now it is time for the residents to answer and ask questions again. The board will <br />take into consideration all that is being. said tonight, from tlieir experts and from the city. But.under no <br />circumstances will the commission curtail anyone from speaking .at the microphone and under no <br />circumstances will they be d.irected as to how to speak and how to talk here; if their intent is to direct <br />the commission in a direction that we do not want to go. Mr. Coyne stated that this was not his intent, it <br />was a question. The commission almost took a vote at the last meeting, which is fine, and they are here <br />to answer any questions. Mr. Tallon stated that the commission is hear to listen, and they are going to <br />do that. Mr. Skoulis (President of the Park West Homeowners' Association), clarified that what. was asked bi <br />Mr. Coyne at the last meeting when he did not want the commission to vote, was that they wanted a <br />6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.