06/10/1997 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

?- ?• ? commercial and residential districts. All of the building is in the commercial district, but the dumpster enclosure and parking is in residential. He clarified that the last three rows of parking will be landbanked as showu on the landscaped drawing. There were no further questions. R Tallon motioned to refer to the architectural review board the proposal of Manor Care, 23225 Lorain Road, a proposal to construct one story building addition and enlarge parking lot. It was clarified the proposal does not need to return to plauning commission u.nless significant changes are suggested at architectural review board and to accept the proposal based on the following agreements: that the parking lot lighting poles and/or wattage be reduced so that there is 0 tolerauce at the lot line; light direction will be down and away from the property lines; proposal shall include the 46 landbanked spaces; and the -drainage is to be refened to the engineering department so that the water is maintained the best way possible. Mr. Tallon believed there could be a mound on the property line with the fence on top runniug from the end of the parking in front of the build.ing on the east side all the way to the back of the property line. He clarified the Engineering Department should address this drainage issue and determine if the mounding along the east property line is appropriate. The commission would like the mounding to be a requirement if it does not adversely effect the drainage. The motion was amended to reflect the granting of the conditional use permit. The motion was seconded by R Koeth and unanimously approved. Motion carried. The clerk advised architectiual review board will discuss this proposal on June 18, 1997 at 5:30 P.M., and five additional sets of drawings are needed for this review. 3) GanleX 25600 Lorain Road (will come ifvariances are rantedl Proposal to construct building addition with site improvements, landscaping and building renovations. Originally heard by planning commission May 27, 1997. To be heard by board of zoning appeals June 5, 1997. Proposal has not yet been reviewed by the architectural review board. Mr. Stoyanov, representing the construction company, advised that the two variances were approved by the board of zoning appeals for building set back and for the displaying of vehicles. The cutrent site plans include recommendations made by the plauning commission at the previous meeting: the driveway approaches were reconfigured; some of the parking that was right up against the sidewalk was eliminated; and 84 parking spaces were landbanked. One house to the east will be removed. It was clarified that the old Glitz Bar was to the west. Mr. Tallon asked if cars were parked in the 75 foot front setback. Mr. Stoyanov responded that cars are parked right up to the sidewalk on both sides of the building, but they will be moving everything back. Mr. Tallon noted that twice before this business had been told not to park cars in the setback. He wondered why the cars were still there. Mr. Stoyanov was not aware of the cars parking in the front. Mr. Tallon highly recommended that those cars be moved back behind the setback in order for this proposal to go through the approval process. The members reviewed the plans for compliance with previous recommendations. The sign package will be presented later. R Tallon motioned to refer to the architectural review board Ganley, 25600 Lorain Road, a proposal to construct building addition with site improvements, landscaping and bu.ilding renovations. It was clarified the proposal will be required to return to planning commission after architectural review board. The clerk advised architectural review board will meet June 18, 1997 at 5:30 P.M., and five additional drawings of the landscaping are needed. Mr. Stoyanov believed he provided enough, and the clerk stated she would check the files. . The motion was seconded by R Koeth and unanimously approved. N. NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: