Laserfiche WebLink
_4 . <br />asked that the commission make sure that it does. Mr. Bradford, who lives to the west of the easement, <br />stated that his garage is 13 feet off this driveway. He thought that the developer stated that there would <br />be a 60 foot driveway on a 22 foot piece of land which did not make sense, and he also questioned how <br />all the utilities could be underneath this small piece of land. He has a copy of the map from Cuyahoga <br />County which sliows the back corner of this as being part of the golf course. He wondered when this <br />transfened. Mr. Rock explained that when the golf course was transfened to the city, this property was <br />excluded from the sa1e. Mr. Bradford asked if the city assu.med that this was part of golf course. Mr. <br />Crabs noted that this would be a landlocked parcel and that was illegal. Mr. Bradford did not know why <br />this request was even being considered, 22 feet is not enough to do anything. He pointed out this is an <br />historic district. He wondered how long the stakes that are on the property would be allowed to stay, <br />they have been there for over a year. Someone from the audience asked if the planning commission had <br />any opinion on this issue. Mr. Bradford repeated the question. Mr. Crabs asked to be heard again and <br />stated that he understood that commission was considering this because they had to. He believed that <br />there would be some philosophy behind the cluster development if there were some green area to <br />support it, but the green area associated with this is a joke, and they could not use the golf course as <br />their green area. He noted that the 22 foot driveway was intended to be used for a single home. He <br />stated that the comprehensive plan was supposed to end all the re-zoning requests. There were no <br />further comments from the audience. <br />Chairman Tallon made a motion for the Delorenzo Rezoning Request, a proposal to rezone permanent <br />parcel nos. 236-23-017, 236-24-019 and 236-24-020 from existing."A" Residence Single District to <br />Single Family Cluster District. Location is south off Butternut Ridge Road adjacent to Springvale Golf <br />Club, to deny the rezoning request for Single Family Cluster in this district, since this proposal does not <br />meet any of the intents of the Single Family Cluster District, the density is heavy for this area which is a <br />Residential "A" area, the families in the area bought their homes and lived in the area and deserve to <br />maintain that zoning which they have abutted for many years. The motion was seconded by T. Herbster, <br />and unanimously approved. <br />A resident, speaking from the audience, questioned if single family homes could be built on this <br />property. Mr. Tallon responded that, if it meets the requirements, the owner can apply for that. Mr. <br />Deiclunann explained that as of now, he could only build one house. <br />V. COMMUr]ICATIONS: <br />No items. <br />VI. COMIVIITTEE REPORTS: <br />No items. <br />VII. MNOR CHANGES: <br />No items. <br />VIII. NEW BUSINESS: <br />No itexns. <br />IIX. OLD BUSINESS: <br />Mr. Herbster stated that after the last meeting for RiteAid, the commission did not vote on the issue of <br />whether or not a variance should be granted so alcohol could be sold there. He would like to members