My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/19/1986 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1986
>
1986 Architectural Review Board
>
02/19/1986 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:33:49 PM
Creation date
1/30/2019 3:00:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1986
Board Name
Architectural Review Board
Document Name
Minutes
Date
2/19/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ARCHITECTURAL BOARD OF REVIEW FEBRUARY 19, 1986 PAGE 2 <br />The Board agreed that a small return would make the fence more stable. <br />Mr. Pattison also questioned if this proposal required a variance, since <br />it would seem that it wi11 be too close to the residential property <br />line. Planning Commission is questioning this also, S. Ebin moved to <br />approve the plans with the following conditions: that the fence at grade <br />be returned approximately 5' north at the west end of the fence, and <br />that it be a neutral color to match the existing building; and that a <br />screen on the south and west side of the roof be provided so that the <br />existing and new mechanical equipment will be screened by a horizontal <br />line in any direction, and that this screening be submitted to this <br />Board for our approval, seconded by D. Pattison, and unanimously approved. <br />Tt was suggested to the developer that the screeing might be the same <br />color as the roof, <br />SIGNS:.;. (Heard at this pqint) <br />1) Hampton Inn (Biskind Development Co.), 25105 Country Club Blvd. <br />3 Wall Signs <br />Mr. Carlisle of Biskind Development Co. explained that the signs will <br />be white internally illuminated neon letters installed on the north, <br />south and east elevations; background will match the building. S. <br />Ebin moved to approve the signs as submitted, seconded by M. Case. <br />Roll ca11 on motion: Ebin, Case, and Britton, Yes. Mro Pattison, <br />abstained. Motion passed, <br />IV. OLD BUSINESS (Heard at this point) <br />Mr. Ebin advised the Board that the ground sign for the Landspan Corp. <br />strip shopping center has been installed and the electricity for that sign <br />is swagged from overhead, The Board had approved the sign with the provi- <br />sion that the wiring must be underground. This overhead wiring must be <br />removed and this situation corrected. Mr. Ebin would like the City to have <br />the developer disconnect the sign until the wiring problem can be corrected. <br />The Building Department. is already checking into this. <br />VI. ADJOURNMFNT: <br />Tfie Board discussed the time of the meeting and decided to meet at 5:00 p.m. <br />M. Case znoved to change the tilne of the meeting to 5:00 p.m., seconded by <br />S. Britton, and unanimously approved. <br />The meeting was adjouzned at 4;45 p,m. <br />M. Case, Chai.rwoman B. Oring, Recording Secretary
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.