04/08/1986 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

?.., r ' PLANNING COMMiSSION APRIL 8, 1986 PAGE 5 stated, in part, that when he purchased the property in 1970 he was lead to believe that it had been properly subdivided; he was also told that he could acquire the property to the rear of sublot 1 in order to develop it; he has been unable to purchase this land, although he has tried on many occassion. Variance to build a house on sublot-1 were granted by the Board of Zoning Appeals both in November of 1980 and in January 1983 ( it had not been determined at that time that property was not legally subdivided); however, since the house was never built, these variances have expired. Mr.-Gibbons claims that if lot is not developed it will remain an eyesore to the neighborhood so they are requesting a reconsid- eration of the proposal. Mr. Schaller pointed out that sublot 2 is nonconforming because it does not have minimum frontage and sublot 1 is nonconforming because it does not meet depth requirements. Mr. Modenbach, a neighbor across the street from sublot 1, presented a statement with the signatures of 12 neighbors who are opposed to the proposal since it would be impossible to construct a conforming house on this property. Mrs. 0'Dell, who ownes property behind sublot 1, stated-that she will never sell part of her property to Mr. Bauer and that she had never given him_the impression that she would. -Mr.- Aarrington, owner of sublot 2, objected that he had not received notice of this--meeting. Mr. Gibbons was notified as the representative of the proposal. T. Morgan moved to approve the Bellevue Fitch lot split, subdivision of parcel 235-18-14 into two parcels 235-18-14 and 235-18- 113. Mr. Dubelko advised that this proposal would have to be referred to the Board of Zoning Appeals. Mr. Morgan withdrew his motion. Mr. Morgan moved to refer the.Bellevue Fitch lot split, subdivision of par- cel 235-18-14-into two .parcels and 235-18-113; be referred to the Board of Zoning _Appeals _-wi.th=- the r.ecommendation= that.- :the 1Dt "split= be- denied-_- --= because it would create a- non-conforming- lot,._seconded _by-.E. Traczyk; -- and unanimously approved. -V. COMMUNICATIONS: Notice of seminar on planning and zoning to be held in Colorado Springs, Colorado. VI. NEW BUSINESS: No itemsm SIII. OLD BUSINESS: ? Members agreed to senclmemo:,which was presented for their approval, to the Architectural Board_of Review. VIII. COMMITTEE REPORTS:- In reference to the Fretters proposal, Mr. Burns advised that the Transpor- tation Study Committee is considering the elimination and vacation of Sparky Lane. They will be meeting before the next Planning Commission meeting. IX. ADJOURNMENT: Mr. Burns moved to excuse the absence of B. Gorris and J. Wixted,-seconded by R. Bierman, and unanimously approved. The meeting was adjourned at 11:25 p.m. J. Burns, G'hairman B. Ori?ng , Recording' Secretary