06/10/1986 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

? CITY OF ?JORTH OLMSTED ,. . PLA..'VNING CO?"IlMISSION MINUTES - JUL1E 10, 1986 l. ROLL CALL: Chairman Burns called the meeting to order at 8:15 p.m. Present: R. Bierman, B. Gorris, E. Traczyk, J. Wixted, J. Brown, and J. Burns. Mr. Morgan arrived at 8:25 p.m. Also Present: Assistant Law birector J. Dubelko, Building Commissioner S. Spino, and Recording Secretary B. Oring. II. REVIEW AD1D CORRECTION OF MIi1UTES : J. Wixted corrected the Minutes of Nlay 27, 1986, on Page 2, line 14 should read "....that board, and also with an understanding that the two lots will be" B. Gorris moved to approve the Minutes of May 27th as corrected, seconded by J. Wixted, and unanimously approved. III. BUILDI?1G DEPARTMENT REQUESTS : 1) Hennie Homes, property located west of John Knox Church (25200 Lorain Rd.) and east of proposed relocated S.R.252. Proposal to construct retail building. (Variance granted by Board of Zoning Appeals May 7, 1986)(Proposal denied by Planning Commission September 24, 1985) (Heard by Architectural Board of Review August 21, 1985) F. Moss, attorney, A. Bender, architect, and P. Zwick, engineer, repre- sented Hennie Homes. Mr. Moss advised that the State of Ohio has with- drawn their objections to the proposal since the developer has met their conditions: An extra five feet has been allowed for right of way, and the grade of the property now meets the grade of the proposed relocated S.R. 252. Mr. Moss read a copy of a letter sent to City Engineer Schaller which reads: "We are in receipt of a revised plan (dated January 9, 1986) received from your office on January 17, 1986 for the proposed construc- ti:on of a retail building at the NEQ of SR 10 (Lorain Road) and relocated SR 252 (Columbia Road) in the City of Ilorth Olmsted. The concerns noted in our previous letter dated October 21, 1985 have been adequately address- ed by Hennie Homes Consultant and we have no objections to the plan as it affects future relocated SR 252 thru this area./The opportunity to comment on the enclosed plan is appreciated./Yours very truly/Martin A. Gallito, P.E./Deputy Director/Richard J. Barnick, P.E./Planning & Design Engineer." This letter was submitted to the Board of Zoning Appeals and subsequently a 20 foot variance has been granted from the 50' set back off SR 252 (50' set back was determined by the Law Department). Variance had lieen granted with the condition that the variance is predicated upon the approval by Planning Coffinission and the Safety Department. Assis- tant Law Director Dubelko advised that the Commission cannot deny the proposal on the basis of the variance, but the Board has allowed Planning Commission and the Safety Department to set the conditions for that