11/25/1986 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

". PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 25, 1986 PAGE 2 does not show property lines or buildings. Mr. Gray explained that fence will run along the eastern lot line (east of old b uilding) along the rear of the property line, come forward and proceed behind the propert_y the nursing home is on and come up along the west property line, west of the new b uilding and stops at the rear corner of th at b uilding. Fence will be approximately 180 feet back from the right of way. It was clarified that the two dealerships are on separate parcels and ab uts property zoned General Retail. Mr. Bierman objected because the plan presented is basically just a sketch which is not to scale and no lot lines are shown. He has problems approving approximately 1,700 feet of fence on this basis and stated that better plans should be presented to the Build- ing Department. It was clarified for Mr. Beck, a member of the audience, that the fence will not extend any closer to Lorain Road than the rear of the buildings. It was explained to Mr. Bierman that lots 26 and 27 on Dover Center Road were zoned General Retail, one is a place of business and the other is owned by Crestmont. J: Burns moved to approve the Crestmont Corporation's proposal to install an 8 foot chain link fence beginning at the existing wood fence that is currently behind the car rental office and the eastern property line (indicated as sublot 2, parcel 33) approximately 180 feet off Lorain going north to the northern most property line extending west along that line and along parcel number 10 and then extending south along parcels 27 and 26, then extending east- ward again along the northern edge.of parcel number 31, and then extending south along the western edge of parcel number 10 coming up to the rear of the new building that has been constructed and will not extend beyond the rear, seconded by T. Morgan, and unanimously approved. 3) Night Fall, 30850 Lorain Road Reveiw of site plan and request for additional curb cut for existing building. Mr. Mihali, contractor, explained that the owner is requesting a curb cut on the side street (Hickory Lane) whi"ch will be posted "entrance only" and the existing drive on Lorain Road will be posted "exit only". They will be adding additional parking to the rear and east side of the pro- perty. Mr. Horvath, the owner, explained that customers frequently miss the Lorain Road drive, then turn into Hickory Lane assuming there is an entrance there,, and are forced to turn around in a private drive. Mr. Mihali stated that the'ordinance requires 2 drives if a parking lot has over 20 spaces. The proposed plan shows 252 seats which will require 126 parking spaces, and 128 spaces are shown. The Building Commissioner stated that since the developer is only requesting a curb cut at this time and since the building is-existing, he has not checked the parking requirements. Mr. Horvath explained that this establishment has been a banquet facility for 7 years and there never was a problem with parking (part of parking area is.gravel); the new business will be a restaurant/ dinner club. The Commission suggested that a second curb cut be made on Lorain Road or the existing cut be enlarged. It was pointed out that there is a residence on the east portion of this same lot which has a drive onto Lorain Road. Assistant Law Director Dubelko questioned why this proposal was being submitted in segments since curb cut, expanded parking, drainage retention, lighting, landscaping, screening of dumpster and buffering from residential property must also be.approved. Mr. Spino explained that the owner will have to comply with these requirements