Laserfiche WebLink
, <br />, <br />.- c <br />PLANNTNG COMMI.SSION DECEMBER 9, 1986 PAGE 2 <br />front of building, close one bay, add 2 entrance doors, clean or paint <br />existing brick on front and east wall, and install awnings over doors. <br />Building is non-conforming and Board of Zoning Appeals granted a special <br />permit on December 3, 1986. No parking plan was presented but Mr. <br />Purper explained that there are approximately 18 parking spaces in the <br />front of the building and parking layout will not be changed. Mr. <br />Bierman questioned why they are not doing all four sides of the building. <br />Mr. Purper explained that the front and east wall were visible from <br />Lorain Road and that the rear was buffered by trees from the residences. <br />Mr. Bierman disagreed stating that the Suburban property was higher <br />than the residential property and the yellow clay tile on the wall is <br />visible to these residences. Since there would be no way to include <br />a planting strip, Mr. Morgan suggested that they put in some planters <br />at the front of the building. T. Morgan moved that the proposal to <br />refurbish the exterior of the Sub urb an Glass and Tire Company be for- <br />warded to the Architectural Board of Review and in keeping with recom- <br />mendations that they might have relative to planters which could be <br />situated next.to the adjacent front wall or any other kind;.of landscaping <br />that might be amenable between the owner and the Architectural Board <br />and to foYward also to the Safety Department, seconded by R. Bierman, <br />and unanimously approved. <br />IV. NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: <br />No items. <br />V. COMMUNICATIONS: <br />Chairman Burns stated that he has received eogies of pxoposals which?•Zaere <br />submitted to"the Mayor from N.O.A.C.A.`andRegional Planning regarding <br />quotes in various areas of planning. The costs of these proposals range <br />from $1,800. to $50,000. Mr. Burns has not had an opportunity to study <br />these as yet. <br />VI. COMMITTEE REPORTS: <br />No items. <br />VII. NEW BUSINESS: <br />Mr. Bierman asked Mr. Dubelko if when an applicant fails to appear at a <br />meeting could the Commission make that applicant re-apply instead of <br />continuing the proposal. Mr. Dubelko adyised that the Commission could <br />disapprove the proposal and they would have to start over. <br />V.III. OLD BUSINESS: <br />Building Commissioner Spino passed out a more detailed plan of the Crestmont <br />Corporation fence which was approved at the last meeting. Mr. Morgan advised <br />that the fence was approved only to the rear corner of the building, not <br />beyond as shown on the plan. Mr. Spino will advise them of that.