05/01/1985 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

, BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MAY 1, 1985 PAGE 2 The Reverand Davis stated that area is lighted and that they have had ve,ry little vandalism. E. Graves moved to grant the request for the extension of the special permit to build a gazebo (open air chapel) in a residential district, seconded by R. Bugala, and unanimously approved. Special permit granted. 4. Robert E. Moyer, 27503 Blossom Blvd. Request for variance (1133.13). Request 7.331 rear yard variance for patio enclosure. Violation of Ord. 62-33, Section 1163.01. Chairman Remmel called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Mr. Moyer and Mrs. Jack, who represented 'the contractor. Chairman Remmel believes that enclosure is too deep and suggested that it be changed to 16' across the rear of the house. Position of the air con- ditioner makes this impossible. Lot to the rear is quite deep. If size of enclosure is reduced they would have to cut existing slab, they now plan to install footers around the outside of existing patio slab. E. Graves moved to grant the 7.33' rear yard variance for the patio enclosure, secon- ded by J. Helon. Roll call on motion: Graves, Helon, Bugala, Aye. Remmel, Nay. Motion passed. Variance granted. 5. John E. Brewer, 4320 Bentley Dr. Request for variance (1133.13). Request 5' rear yard variance for addition. Violation of Ord. 62-33, Section 1163.01. Also request special permit for non-conforming dwelling (front set back). Special permission required Ord. 62-33, Section 1231.02. Chairman Remmel called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Mrs. Brewer and Mr. Paulker; the contractor. There is an enclosed patio on adjacent lot on one.side of the property, and an ad- dition on the other side. C. Remmel moved to grant the variance and the special permit, seconded by E. Graves, and unanimously approved. Variance and special permit granted. 6. George and Linda Shumay, 5820 Barton Road Request for variance (1133.13). Request 1' height variance for fence. Vio- lation of Ord. 62-33, Section 1151.04-H. Also on corner side of property request variance for solid fence, not 3' from property line. Violation of Ord. 62-33, Section 1151.04H-2. Chairman Remmel called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Mr. and Mrs. Shumay who explained that soccer field is behind their property and they want some privacy in their rear yard. They are requesting a 6' fence on the rear property line, but stated that the portion of the fence on the Bradley Road side (corner) is not to be placed on the property line (as indicated on site plan),,it will be inside their property to approximately where the soccer field fence ends. The board agreed that the 6' fence on the south property line should not extend to the front building line, but is willing to accept a 6' fence to the east end of the patio to give them more privacy.. R. Bugala moved that the 1' height variance be provided for a solid fence that extends on the back west property line, no further north than the exisitng 4' chain link fence and that the 6' solid fence on the south side of the property extend no further