12/05/1984 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

.1 dl? BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS DECEMBER 5, 1984 PAGE 4 seconded by E. Graves, and unanimously approved. Special permit granted. 7. Rober W. Messenger, 28036 Wisteria Request for variance (1133.13). Request 1' height variance for fence (dog pen -- already installed.) Violation of.Ord. 62-33, Section 1151.04-H. Chairman Remmel called all interested parties before the Board. The oath was administered to Mr. and Mrs. Messenger. Dog pen is two lengths of 6' fence, and Mr. Messenger stated that dogs behind him can get over a 5' fence into his dog pen. He has told the neighbor who complained that they will keep the dog.in the garage at night. A letter from Hyatt Legal Clinic explaining the neighbor`s concern had been submitted to the Board. C. Remmel moved to grant the variance, seconded by R. Bugala, and unani- mously approved. Law Director Gareau will acknowledge the letter from Hyatt Legal Clinic. 8. Dale Hickle, 24258 Elm Rd. Request for variance (1133.13). Request variance to place 30" fence on vacant lot (adjacent to residence). Violation of Ord. 62-33, Section 1151.04. Chairman Remmel called all interested parties before the Board. The oath was administered to Mr. Hickle and Mr. Shipley, his neighbor, who questioned what type of fence was to be installeda Since fence would be adjacent to his drive, he would like it installed a couple of feet away. It was ex- plained that fence can be right next to property line. He stated he is not sure where property line is. Mr. Hickle advised that this will be a split rail fence and he knows where property line is. Mr. Gundy stated that it is the responsibility of the home owner to put the fence on his own property, no survey is required. If fence is not on property, it would be a civil matter and Mr. Hickle would have to remove the fence. There was a complaint that Mr. Hickle was splitting and selling wood from his residence. He claims that he split the wood and has been giving it to his family. Mr. Bugala suggested that fence should be placed either to the front of the residence next door or all the way to the rear of the house; not just a piece of fence. Mr. Hickle agreed to put the fence to the rear line of the neighbor's house. R. Bugala moved to allow the split rail fence on sub- lot 17 to extend to the rear house line of the western adjacent neighbor's home and that the fence, as constructed, meets all building code require- ments, and that this variance shall apply only to this section of fence, any additions must require another variance, seconded by C. Remmel, and unanimously approved. Variance granted. Chairman Remmel advised Mr. Hickle that the city would be checking to see if a business is being co.n- ducted on the property. 9. National City Bank, 26440 Lorain Rd. Request for variance (1133.13). Request front set back variance to add A.T.M. enclosure. Violation of Ord. 62-33, Section 1174.02. Also request special permit to add to non-conforming building. Special permission re- quired Ord. 62-33, Section 1231.02. (Variance denied October 3, 1984. This proposal differs because of altered traffic pattern). Chairman Remmel called all interested parties before the Board. The oath was administered to Mr. Skinner, the contractor. This is the same type of enclosure, however, posts and wheel blocks will be installed so that cars