10/03/1984 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OCTOBER 3, 1984 PAGE 2 was administered to Mr. Pascal and Pir. LaRussa of Kingsman Home Improve- ment. Lot is over 300 feet deep. R. Bugala moved to grant the 7' variance and the. special permit, seconded by E. Graves, and unanimously approved. Variance and special permit granted. 3. Don R. Fox, 4554 Gladland Ave. Request for variance (1133.13). Request 7'1" variance for distance between addition and detached garage. Violation of Ord. 62-33, Section 1151.04-C. ! Chairman Remmel called all interested parties before the Board. The oath was administered to D. Fox. Lot is very deep..,Board questioned if he could v back out of garage on side closest to the house. This side is used for storage. C. Remmel moved to grant the variance, seconded by J. Helon, and unanimously approved. Variance granted. 4. National City Bank, 26440 Lorain Rd. Request for variance (1133.13). Request front set back variance to add A.T.M. enclosure. Violation of Ord. 62-33, Section 1174.02. Also Request special permit to add to non-conforming building. Special permission re- quired Ord. 62-33, Section 1231.02. (Variance denied Oct. 6, 1982.) Chairman Remmel called all interested parties before the Board. The oath / was administered to Mr. T. Skinner, contractor and R.' Kline, manager of the ? bank. Enclosure is smaller, has clear glass, and is more open than the v enclosure requested previously. Mr. Graves stated that he still has con- cerns about safety in that.location since cars pull up so close to the sidewalk; it is a bad situation without the enclosure. Board still be- lieves that automatic teller machine should be relocated or the bank should elirsinate all traffic in the front. Mr. Kline stated that they are considering putting a drive-in A.T.M. at the rear of the building. He will take the Boards thoughts back to the management. C. Remmel moved to grant the vairance, seconded by R. Bugala. Roll call on motion: Remmel, Bugala, Graves, and Helon, Nay. Motion failed to pass. Variance denied. Chairman Remmel questioned why a tow truck is allowed.to park in a resi- dential area at Deerfield and Hunter Drives, at a location where the Board had previously ruled that a moving van could not be parked. He also stated that he has seen the van there again. Mr. Gundy stated that the Building Department has no way of knowing that the van was back unless they are notified, either by the Board.members or the neighbors, or unless an in- spector would see it during a routine inspection. He advised that in two other cases where tractor/trailer cabs have been brought back, the city is taking the owners back to court. As far as the tow truck is con- cerned there could be some question as to whether it would fall under this ordinance since the ordinance reads "trucks with a rated capacity of one ton or over". Mr. Gundy is working with the police and the Law De- partment to clarify this. Mr. Remmel asked for the disposition of a violation he had reported on , Walter Road, where it can be presumed that the residents are repairing cars as a business in a residential district. These records are in the Building Department and Mr. Gundy will check into them; however, it was explained