My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/24/1984 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1984
>
1984 Planning Commission
>
01/24/1984 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:34:16 PM
Creation date
1/30/2019 4:42:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1984
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
1/24/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
°?',PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 24, 1984 PAGE 3 <br />would generate even more traffic. Commission is concerned regarding <br />possible use of the back half of the property; access could be granted <br />by Bob Evans for another commercial building. Mr. Vollman stated that <br />they would be very conderned as to what they would allow there and they <br />also would be interested in maintaining their visability from Brookpark <br />Road. Mr. Roberts stated that since surrounding property is mostly <br />general retail this is a reasonable request and would like an opinion <br />from Regional Planning Commission. Mr. Gorris questioned if zoning <br />could be split (front half general retail, rear portion something else). <br />The Law Department will research this. He also explored the idea that <br />perhaps there could be some way that this property could be used by the <br />adjacent Rini's store, whose request for an addition had been rejected. <br />Mr. Richland stated that there were some restrictions for the use of <br />the back property which are to`be included in the purchase agreement. <br />Law Department would like a copy of this. Mr. Richland will see if <br />he can make this available to Mr. Dubelko. Mr. Burns would like infor- <br />mation as to what type of high rise building could be built on this <br />property and what resulting traffic pattern would be. T. Morgan moved <br />to continue the rezoning request for parcel #236-2-2, for input from <br />the Law Department as to what restrictions could be placed on the rear <br />of the property and also that a letter of the proposed rezoning be sent <br />to the Regional Planning Commission requesting any comment and recom- <br />tnendations that they might have, seconded by J. Roberts, and unanimously <br />approved. <br />2) Great Northern Corporate Center Water Main Easements <br />Proposal is for the re-establishment and acceptance of a previous <br />watermain easement located on parcel.236-14-3 (northeast corner of the <br />intersection of. Country Club Blvd. with Great Northern Blvd), which <br />was vacated in 1982 by Ordinance No. 82-17. <br />Assistant City Engineer D. McDermot explained that easement had been <br />vacated and now Great Northern wants to reinstitute part of the previous <br />easement. J. Wixted moved to approve the p:roposal for the re-establish- <br />ment and acceptance of the watermain easement located on parcel 236-14-3 <br />which was vacated in 1982 by Ordinance No. 82-17, seconded by J. Burns, <br />and unanimously approved. <br />V. COMMUNICATTONS: <br />Ordinance 84-2: This is to vacate North Olmsted Court which runs through <br />City property and is now used as an internal drive within the City Com- <br />plex. Mr. Morgan would like to see a plan for landscaping and lighting <br />the parking lot and drive. T. Morgan moved to approve Ord. 84-2, vaca- <br />ting North Olmsted Court as a dedicated street, and would like to request <br />that landscaping plans for parking lot and lighting be provided to Plan- <br />ning Commission for review, seconded by J. Brown. Roll call on Motion: <br />Moxgan, Brown,v Gorris, Traczyk, Wixted, Aye. Roberts, Nay. Motion passed. <br />pyms <br />Commission discussed summons from Romp Brothers suit regarding the re- <br />jection of rezoning request. A letter was also received from the Attorney <br />? General of the State of Ohio advising that he would not be participating <br />in the action at this time, but is reserving the right to be heard at ' <br />a later date. Mr. Dubelko will keep the Commission advised on progress <br />of case.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.