05/25/1982 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1 PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 25, 1982 PAGE 5 would like this eliminated. Mr. Durica explained that this will tie into their national advertising and is necessary to their business. Assistant Law Director Dubelko stated that there is nothing in the Ordinance to prohibit putting the price on signs. Councilman Woerple, of the BZD Committee, stated that a permanent sign showing the price would seem to be less objectionable:.':t?a?i.temporary signs and banners which are used to display the prices. R. Perla moved to ap- prove the Sparks Tune Up proposal with the recommendation that the one western most parking space immediately adjacent to the pole sign be eliminated, and to approve the pole sign as presented, and to approve the wall sign with the recommen- dation that.the "39.90 including parts and labor" be elimin- ated; if the BZD Committee determines that this statement should not be eliminated then it is suggested that the let- ters and numbers be of uniform color and size, seconded by T. Morgan. Roll call on motion: Perla, Morgan, Roberts, Gorris, and, Brown. Burns abstained. 05?V_) (9) West Haven Foundation (Alfred C. Bender), 29734 and 19756 Lorain Proposal for additions to two (2) homes to be used for Group Family Homes for retarded. The Commission received the Legal Opinion which it had requested an May llth. Assistant Law Director Dubelko explained that the - Board of Zoning Appeals had determined that West Haven is a permitted commercial use and that: "A Group/Family Home should not be, for such a purpose, likened to any particular enumer- ated use within the District. Instead, in determining which provisions of the Code apply to it, the Commission should-look only to the general provisions of Sections 1174:01_to 1174.10, and Title 19, of the Zoning Code, which govern all permitted uses in the District, unless otherwise specifically excepted. (Legal Opinion No. 82-4). The Legal Department had also con- cluded that since the proposed use is Commercial this appli- cation for a building permit is properly before the Planning. Commission. In response to Mr. Gorris questions, Mr. Dubelko stated that since there are 2 separate homes and since both 80' lots were platted prior to the 150' frontage requirement, the parcels need not be assembled. Mr. Gundy advised.that since the two properties are owned by the same party, there is no problem with the common drive. Mr. R. Archer of West Haven explained the revised plans which include the recom- mendations of tlie ArchitecturalBoard of May 17th. The 6' fence is planned to extend 150' on the eastern property line of the eastern most property and on the western property line of the western most property. The existing landscaping will remain except for one tree which must be removed. A petition was submitted stating that there-was concern regarding:.(1) the proximity of the homes to Lorain Rd. (2) proximity to