11/10/1981 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r s J - , J PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 10, 1981 PAGE 2 the possibility of having the egress from the Lorain Road drive a right turn only, and that they consider removing the south westerly most parking space, seconded by T. Morgan, and unaaimously approved. (2) Jack's Auto Body, 27114 Lorain Rd. Proposal to construct addition to front of existing building. Mr. Gundy explained the plans for the 12' x 20' office ad- dition to the front of the existing building which will be constructed of cedar siding and block. Sinte__this is not a major addition, the Commission believes that the plans pre- sented by Mr. Prest would be acceptable to the Architectural Board of Review. Mr. Prest will be doing some of the work himself and will be subcontracting a part of it. R. Perla moved to refer the Jack's Auto Body addition to the Archi- tectural Board of Review, seconded by J. Brown, and unani- mously approved. IV. NEW DEVELOPMENTS AATD SUBDIVISIONS: (1) Andrew Rizzo Rezoning Request. Proposal is to rezone three (3) parcels, 232-10-45, 232-10-46, and 232-10-47, located on the east side of Por•ter Rd. north of Lorain Road, from the currect Class "B" residence, Single Zone to Retail Business, General Zone. Held in CouIInittee October 27, 1981. J. Burns moved to take the Andrew Rizzo Rezoning Request out of committee, seconded by R. Perla, and unanimously approved. Mr. Rizzo was not present. In answer to the Planning Commis--- sion's request for a legal opinion, Assistant Law Director J. Dubelko advised that Section 1124.04 pertaining to the General Retail Business area being on Lorain and Brookpark Roads was not applicable to this request. He also stated that Planning Cosunission, as the platting authority, could approve or disapprove any rezoning request based on the best interest of the city, in the case of a rejection the request is not automatically forwarded to Council. The petitioner may, if he so desires take the request to Council, in the event of an approval by Council, the reauest must then be referred again to Planning Commission. A two-thirds vote of Council would then be required to over-ride Planning Commission's rejection. The neiohbors aoain voiced their objections to the rezoning. T. Morgan moved that the Andrew Rizzo rezoning request be denied since the properties mentioned in this re- quest have been platted as residential property and the de- velopment of these properties as corunercial lots is not in the best interest of the City of \orth Olmsted, seconded by J. Brown, and unanimously approved.