10/24/1978 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

? ' r ? ..• PLANNING COPkSISSION OCTOBER 24, 1978 PAGE 2 ? stated the impossibility of this because of legal pecularities, further discussion related to metering traffic into the problem area by an ad- justment in timing the existing traffic signals. State Wholesale would not object to adjacent properties using their property to help eliminate probler,is. Capitol National has been approached. There were observations that this would be a short cut to Dover Center and make it heavily traveled. Mr. McDermott explained that tlie development is in three parcels and will need assembling into one. Chairman Roberts called all people concerned with the buffer location before the commission. The location was explained. Chairman Roberts called for a motion notifying home owners at which time any questions about the buffer strip will be heard. Mr. Prokasy made a motion that the proposed State Wholesale be retained in committee until jtraffic studies are received from the City Safety Department, the plan be submitted to Regional Planning Commission for recommendations per traffic situation, and a request for assembly of the three lots into one since the building now proposed is on a property line. Second by D. Ryan and passed unanimously. Gundy is instructed to forward the information to Regional Planning Commissionm Homeowners requested clarification of fence termi- ation, and basically agreed with the plan. NEW DEVELOPMENT AA1D SUBDIVISIOIdS None -IV; COMM[JNICATIONS Letter from residents of Silverdale Rd. read by Secretary asking for water drainage plan, ience 7 foot from property line with concrete curbs to protect fence. This communication relates to the development of State Wholesale property. Memorandum from Regional Planning in response to the request at the meeting of September 26, 1978 per U-Store-It rear property be rezoned from C res- idential to retail business general and the new rezoning will:'.abutt land that is designated for a proposed subdivision. The recommendation is not to rezone. r4r. RaAmsdale came before the Commission asking for the op- portunity to submit a redraft of his plan which will more clearly depict the proposal. After review of the memorandum Mro Amsdale has uncovered two errors which are: (1) Regional Planning assumes the rezoning overlaps a proposed residential subdivision and (2) the retention basin is no longer part of the subdivision. He wants to clarify the record by re- submission. Mr. Gareau questions the recent purchase of this land from the subdivision developer and why this was not accomPlished prior to sale. Mrm Amsdale considers the confusion caused by this plan an error in drafting. A11 land under study is undeveloped. Mr. Prokasy made a motion to retain in committee and requests the developer to furnish more accurate drawings. Second by Mr. Ohman,, and unanimously approved. The new sign ordinance 78-145 was referred to the committee considering signs. Chairman of this committee is R. Bugala. V. NEW BUSINESS None