Laserfiche WebLink
a ? <br />City of North O1msted <br />BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS <br />December 3, 1975 <br />Chairman I,edvina called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.ms <br />Present: Messrse Ledvina, Hamill, Huntington9 Olson and Duskey <br />Also Present: Building Commissioner Gundy, Law Director Gareau and Recording <br />Secretary Hodgins. <br />Mr. Duskey moved to approve minutes of November 13, 1975 meeting as submitted. <br />Mra Hamill seconded and motion passed unanimously. <br />L Steve Walker, 6051 Belleview Dr. Request for variance (1133.13)o Request <br />for 1 fto variance for fence. Violation oi ardv 62-33 Section 1151.04o <br />Presents Mrs. 'vJalker and three neighbors who were administered the oatho <br />Five ft. fence is erected. Case and appeal were read. Fence is <br />inside property line; it is chain link fence with plastic slats <br />and is 300 plus ft. in lengtha The extenuating circumstance is <br />two dogs which are to be enclosed in fence. Mr. Olson asked for <br />clarification of the ordinance. After some discussion Mr. Ledvina <br />moved to approve the request. Nfr. Huntington seconded the motion <br />Roll Call on the motiono ltessrs. Zedvina, Huntington and Duskey <br />voted ayee Mr. Hamill a.bstained from voting. Mr. Olson voted <br />nay. Motion passed. <br />Zaw Director Gareau suggested letter be written by Building Com- <br />missioner Gundy reprimanding fence builder because he failed to <br />obtain permit. <br />2. Matthew G. & Katherine Sylvester, 4389 Danberr.y Dr. Request for variance <br />(1133•13). Request for sideline varianceo Violation of Ord. 1161.O1m <br />Present: Mr< and N:rs. 'gylvester who were administered the oath. Case <br />and appeal were reade 21 in. sideline variance is needed for <br />protruding chimney. Plans -were studied. Mrs Duskey moved to <br />grant 21 in. sideline variance to accommodate chimney. Mre <br />Hamill seconded and motion passed unanimously. <br />3, Robert R. & Nancy Warren, 5647 Revere Dro Request for variance. Request <br />for 1 ft. variance for fence heighte Violation of Ord. 62-33 Section 1151.04. <br />Present: Ms. and Mrs. Tpiarren who were administered the oath. Case and ap- <br />peal were rzado A 20 x 8 x 5 ft. fence for dog run is planned. <br />There are deep lots behind and no problem vaith neighbors. 12r. <br />Hamill moved to grant 1 ft. variance for fence height for construc- <br />tion of 20 ft. x 8 ft. dog run at rear of property. Mr. Duskey seconded and motion passed unanimouslyo <br />Recycled Bond - Oae etep to eave our environment