Laserfiche WebLink
15 <br />planning Commission of the Village of North 07msted, Ohi.o <br />C'auncil Chamber, Vi3.lage Hall <br />Mar ch 31, 19 310 <br />Members present - Eainbra.dge, Putsch, and Widenero <br />absent - Rock and iZayor Seltzere <br />other Vi17.a;e afficials present - Engineer Cloyd. <br />Aoti ng Chai rman - B. G. Bainbri dge . <br />The Minutes of February 24, 1931 read and approved'. <br />The Brookpark Road Committee o£ the Kivranis Club, consisting of Hume1, Conantp <br />Jones, and Hax'ra.son were presenta <br />The $ecrEtary read a report on Dro McKay+s add.ress t;o the KiQianxs G1ub on the <br />proposea Brookpark Roa.d improvement. . <br />pr. NtcKay stat,Ed that $400,000.OO.to $50090OOg00 Fed@ral aid can be <br />secured for the Rockjr River BricTge if this project is started promptly <br />and if the right-of'-vray is securecl f'rom one existing Federml aid route <br />to another, namely, Vdaoster Pike to Center Ridge R.oada <br />TY:e cost of the high l,evel bridge across the Rocky River Va11ey might <br />be $1,000,00OOsO0 -Low level Bridge abou-t $600,OOOo00o The difference <br />wou 1d be Federal a.id money. ' <br />He es'cimated the cost of a road tivould be $1.00 to $1:25 per f'ront foot. <br />If the rightmof-wa.y is not secured soon it means no Fed'eraJ. aid, no <br />State partieipation, and no raad since the County cannot assurne the <br />entire burden. It means a loss of 4?,"400,OOOs00 Federal aid on the <br />bridge and $15,dX= per mile cver the entire route,. <br />The Seeretaxy also read sn outZine of the project and recammendations received <br />from Dr. McKayos Offiae, of the Clevel.and Chamber of Commerce. <br />pna of the major recommendations of the Federal Plan of Highway Improvem <br />ment was the construction.of a,n East and West Belt Route acrass. Cuyahoga <br />County along the approxinate line of the exi.sting Broalcpark -Road, extend- <br />in,g from. CQnter Ridge Road at 1;he Urain County Line to South N'll.1es <br />Avenue at I-aiizg. Road. <br />The tentative location of this route was acc;epted as State Rou°te 43 by <br />the State Hightivay Departnient in 1929, allotiving the State Highway Depart- <br />L-Ent to participate in the cost of constxvctirlg'the project and thus <br />lightpn the bux'den of taxati.on which the County, Villa.ges, and Property <br />pwnsrs would otherwi.se have to bear. <br />The tentative ].ocation has been sa designod. to conforrn to Federal Aid <br />requiremen-ts so that aid may be secured from the Federal Governmento <br />Before the County can institu.•te proeeedings whicr wou7.d lead to the