My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/13/1959 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1959
>
1959 Planning Commission
>
01/13/1959 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:36:00 PM
Creation date
1/31/2019 4:44:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1959
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
1/13/1959
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
- 2 - <br />instead of the usua.7. 50 foot set-baclc. By doing so, when tha street <br />is extended, all homes wi11 hage the same set-back and oriLy the <br />sidevaa"lk and eurbing on one side of the street will. have to be <br />relocated. The interior radius of the turn-around can be 20 feet <br />and the axterior radius Of eet . <br />A/ Q <br />Regarding an easement on the Mary Biadus property for sewer and <br />maintenance of said sewer, Mr. Oviatt said that there should be an <br />outright congeyance ? prepaxed by legend on linen,. to the city. <br />n <br /> <br /> <br />Drainage ditch plans. <br />Rather i:han use the plan 4vhereby the drainage flow would go through <br />a ditch locatad in the front yards of people living on Lansng Drive, <br />even though the developer would grade and rep7a ce existing tile under <br />driveways with 36 inch ti7.e, it tinas felt that Iulr. Kanareffs' alternate <br />plan rolocatinR the ditch on the other side_ of the street vrould be best. <br />Av <br />Mr. Kanareff m?.the motion to aecept the a'lternate ditch p'lan if it <br />was tiled for the complete length of the alternate ditch. and the <br />developer would participate in one-half of tha c:ost if the city <br />, viou1d pay the balance-*?% Mr. Grumney seconded the motion. Roll call <br />was taken. Mr. Sipe, Mr a Grumney, Mr. Barnes and. Ur. Taylor approved. <br />Item 3. Countp recordir_g of suUd.ivisions. <br />In answer to the question asked at the November 25th meeting as to <br />whether or not the county car_ accept and record p7.ats and subdivisions <br />thereof, without the prior approval of the city planning commission, <br />Mr. Ovia-tt said that it is not contrary to the acts. and duties of the <br />county recorder. Hoviever, if the city planning comrnission has not <br />approved the subdivisioz!, the building.commissioner should not issue <br />permi.ts to construct in subdivision. <br />A land title compar_y guaxantees titles of records subject to zoning <br />ordinances. The title is guaranteed, its use is note <br />Item 4. Olmsted Colony Subdivision„ Inc. <br />Mr. Vrilliam Halishak presented his Master Gener.a7. Overall P1an. <br />Engineering had been checked by Mr. Kanareff. The motion for <br />approval was mt3de by Mr. Baxnes9 seconded by Mr. Sipe a.nd approved <br />by the commi.s sione <br />He also presertted improvement plan numbers 3 9 4and 5that go along <br />with this. Mr. Sipe recommended that the iollov,ring be noted on the p'lansa <br />Recommend basementless homes or basements vi th sump puwps. <br />Sump pump-installation shouYd be separate from wash tub, should <br />bypass septic tank and go in.to storm sewer. <br />Storm sewer skould be of sufficiont cApacity to a].so cax°ry <br />d ovrnspot viat er • <br />Mr. Kanareff recommended that improvament-plans for wator mains, <br />storm seVrers, sidevralks and paving be accepted. <br />Mr. Grumraey mar3e -the motion, on Mr. Kanareffs' recommendation, to <br />approve plan numbers 3' 4 and 5. il'tr. Sipe seconded the motion. <br />Roll call was taken. Mr. Sipe, Rx•. Crumney, Mr. Barnes and LIr. <br />TayZor approvedo
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.