Laserfiche WebLink
Ct?? ?f Yvrt4 (PXnYsfeb, (04to <br />CI7.'Y OF NaRTH QI14,STID BUR.D OF ZOINTNG AFPPEALS <br />REGULAR NEETING IUT3 AT 7.'HE CITY, HALL YiU 8, 1963 <br />Meeting was cal].ed to order at 7s35 P•Me <br />Members Present: Messrs. Byers, Greeize, ninite, Mor.gan and Smith. <br />members Absent: None <br />Also Presento N1r. Ernest J. CundY, Building.Commissioner <br />pthers as listed unc3er ItAppellants". <br />Minutes of April 2, 1963 meeting were read an.d corrected, as indicated in <br />minutes inserted in book., <br />1. A,pPellantr Kre Rolf BolLn9 27732 Lorain Rdm, N. Qlmsted, Q. <br />Referencer Erection of a]3eauty Salon sig?-n at the above addxess, <br />? A proposed L; i x31 sign will extend over sidewal!c similar to other signs in same : <br />locality. Erection is in vioJ.ation of present Zoning Ord e, Chapter 1225.02. <br />. ,Appellant, because of his working hours, was not present at the tim.e his appeal <br />wa.s hearcl,, but he did app.ear bef ore the meeting ad j ourned. There were no <br />neighbors present opposing appealo <br />zn.asmuch as.proposed sip w111 confoz°m to other signs now in appe7lantt s <br />vicinity, I4re Smith moved -that variance be grantecl. Motion seconcled by . <br />. .Mr. Creene and.-unanimously approved, . <br />2, A,ppellant: Pa.cer Gonstruction Corp., 21380 Lorain Rda, N. Q]oms-?ed, 0? <br />'°- N1ra Robert Mi7.1.er, (Pacer); Nlrs. E. V. Ba.ker, 22977 Stoneybrooku <br />Reference: Back Yard £ootage variance on Svblot No. 39,.Stoneybrook? <br />. Subdivisiono Appellant reciuests a back yard variance on Sublot Noe 39' 22973 Stoneybr.ook' <br />as the house now planned on this sublot is in violating oi present Zoning Qrd., <br />C"r_apter 1163, 5ub-Chapter.1163 -0l9 - Comp],aint was registered 'by home awner on Subl-ot A?o, 40, 22977 Stonefbrook, <br />Yir. E. V. Bake.r, who stated that house as.originally planned, and which had no <br />Code.violations, would block his view. Lots in aa.estion are on a cul-de-sace <br />N1rse gaker, present at meeting, approved appellantts drawing indicating the <br />house as now plan.xied would not obstruct vision from their picture window. <br />Inasmuch as property in back of lots 39 and 40 are deep, ar_d there was no opposi- <br />tion from neighbors, lfir. KLinite moved tha.t variance be grantedd Motion seconded <br />17 Nirs Byers and Uranimously approvedm