Laserfiche WebLink
Board o£ Zoning Appeals <br />Ju].y 2, 1963 Meeting - Page 2 <br />3* Appellant; Jo-hn Acocel7..a, 3657 W. 117 Sto, Cleve. 11, Ohio, represented by the <br />TnTil.liam L. Riryu Co,, Mr. Fra.nk N. A,7.exander. <br />Reference; Front and rear-line variance on home contemplated for Sub-lor'u 1A <br />ocated in the Fairvi.ew Gardens Allotmen.t on Clague Rc1e bettATeen Lorain and <br />Summerland. <br />I•t was disclosed that appellant o-TATns home on -the same l.at as the proposed new home. <br />Division of this lot has not as yet besn a,pproved 'mj the Plznning Comm.issionA Tre <br />Boa.rd fee7.s it is not in a position to grant a variance on a lot that does not <br />exzst as far as the reeord is concerneclg, It was suggested to appellant tha-t this <br />be ta.ken up wi.th the Planning Commission to see if they will permit the division of <br />the lota <br />Case is held in abeya.nce$ <br />4, ,A;ppe? 11ant: Clark G. Koson, 3831 ftoot Nd., N. Olmsted, 0? <br />Reference: 152 variance request between direlling and a.proposed new garage.? <br />.qppellant wa,s represented by his father, Mr. :A,l.ex Koson. A neigh.bor? illro James A. <br />prokasy, 4034 Root Rel., N. Olmsted, 0., was in to see Board member Mr. Smith and <br />? advised he hacl no objection to ap pella.ntYS request. No neighborsrrkrere present at <br />the meeting. <br />Board fe].t that information furnished by Mr. Koson and details and measurements on <br />the appeal form were not sufficient or accurate; also' letters from neighbors <br />inciicating their reactions would be desirable. <br />Mr. Smith moved that the case be tabled pEnding the abovee Motion seconded by <br />Mr. Green_ and approved by NIr. Byers, Mr. Morgan abstained from voting. <br />5' ,&ppellant: Flair Builders, 5299 State Rd., P• xma 34, Qs, represented by <br />v r. Earl M. I6inden. <br />Reference: 3$ Side Line Variance on home partialJ.y completed on S/L #35, <br />Deerfield Es-L-a.tes No. 2, 24,155 Faixlawn Dro, N. Olmsted, 0. <br />Home is partially completed and on the two foot West lot J.ine- Adjoining home <br />has a side line of lOt 0 Home in question is just Hunder roof". Purchasers will <br />be aclvised of error in 5urveying and will be aware of th.e side line measurements. <br />Because home is on a 501 lot, Board is satisfied that this tqas a surveying error. <br />Under the circutnstances and with a lot of room on the other side of i;he housey <br />Mr. Smith moved that variance be granted.a Motion seconded by N1r. Greene and <br />unanimously approveela <br />•