Laserfiche WebLink
(9ttV .?f 'Wvse#4 01mo#.eb, <br />CITY QF NQRTH QLMSTED B01?TRD OF ZONTTdG A??Isa "S. <br />SPECI-V, MEETING HEID .P,.T ?IE C2TY ?-u? JUIY 16' 1963 <br />Meetirlg was callecl to order at 7:30 P.M. <br />Members present: Messrs. Djers, Kl.inize, Morgan and Smith <br />Members abser_t: gZr. GreenE <br />!Uso present; Mr. Ernes t J. Gundy, Euilding Coimr!? ssicner <br />Qthes°s, as lis'ced uncler Appellants <br />Minutes of July 2., 7_963 MePting were read and c pprovecl. <br />1, Appellanta Clark G. T?asQr!, 3831Root Rd., N. Olmsted, 0. <br />R.eference: 151 va.riance request between dwelling and a proposec new garage* <br />(See Case No. 4, Juiy 2, 1963 Meetir_g). <br />Appellant present ar_d hacl submitted new detailed plans a7.ong with a letter signed <br />'by five neighbors indicating no objection to pronosec7 gara.gea <br />Creek running along back of prcperty ma.kes bui7.dina of garage o'uher tlvan as <br />indicatecl' irnpossiblee Ga.rage wi.l.l tie in zaith dwelling and wi11 be fire--proof. <br />Mr. Smitr inoved that varia.nce be granied. Motion seCOnded by Mr. Byers ard <br />unanimously approved,• <br />2, A,ppellantd Mr. William L. Uddy, 4555 coE Pve,, N. 0lmsted, Q. <br />Referer_ce; Request for a 161 length of fence higher thail 41 as set forth <br />in. 4oning VS"V • ilP.Ce 1.i51a04• . <br />Present; Mr. Kiddy, Jr,, representing appellant. <br />NeigY?bors Normam F. Strela.u, 4539 Coe <br />J o Cary Nettles 9 23916 E]in <br />J. F. Dunr_, 23884 i,7.m <br />Appellant rresented letter signed by his irn.mediate back neighbors, Anthon.y Ristifo <br />and Michael Mertich, 23852 and 23868 Elm, indicating no objection to fer_ce. <br />Nea.ghbors present at meeting voiced no objectionsn Requested fence on the back <br />property line is for patio priva.cy. <br />The 73oard selt that privacy could be achi-etred with the height fence as set fortr in <br />the Qrdinance. Also, this appeal elid not indicat-e a. IZardslzip or shol.zI-a there be an <br />exception rnade beczuse of the fact that neighbors dicl not indicatie aiV objectionss <br />Nlr. Iainite moved that variance be denied. Motion secended by rZrs Sr?ith and <br />un.-Lnisoousl.y approved-o <br />- 1 -