Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r <br />Board of Zoriing Appeals <br />July 21, 1964 Meeting - Page 2 <br />Coritinuation of Appellant; North 0_.msted Baptist Church <br />StipuJ.ations for issuing of a permita <br />1a Set-EacY - A,ccording to submitted plants <br />2a Driveiray - Black-toppede Mirunum of 18e Iiidee <br />j. Farking - Side and rear of building, <br />4e Drainage - Accorc3ing to City Engineerts speci-ficationse <br />5. I,andscaping. - To be properly lar.dscaped. Existing large trees to remain <br />and others to be plantedo Shrubs near drive of adjacent <br />property, 4792 Dover Center Rd., to remain. <br />6o Future Additions Subject to review and approval by the Board. <br />7. Entire p].ans and drat,rings subject to review by the Board. <br />Appellant advised that future expansion and added parising facilities Vrill be in <br />the back of the church as they own at least 1001 behind area proposed for t he <br />church. <br />? It was moved by Mr. Greene that Use Perm-it be granted per plans on file; however, <br />future aclditions will be subject to review and ?pproval by the Board.. Motion <br />seconded ty Mr. Ifl.ini-te and unanimously approved. • <br />3a Appellant; Richard Kugler, 1469 W. 110th St., Cleveland, Om <br />'Ref; 141 Back Yard Variance on proposed home to be built on Sublots <br />389 and. 390 Decker Rdm, N. Olmsted, Oo (Chapter 1163, Sub-Chapter <br />1163.01, Fage 42)s <br />Appellantts appeal had been on the Agenda for the Juiy 14, 1964 Meeting. As he <br />was not present, case had been tabled f or the August 11, 1964 Meeting. Appellant <br />advised he misunderstood notification and did not believe he was -to be present. <br />Mr. Greene movect that we remove the "table" from the minutes of Jul;,T 14, 1964 <br />(Item 6), and hear appeal at this meeting. Ylr. Klinite seconded motion and it <br />was unanimausly approved. <br />in <br />Appellant advised that proposed dwelling would be/line with other exi.sting homes <br />and that because of the shortness of the lots, a back yard would be necessai-Y f or <br />their utilization. %variance <br />Mr. Greene moved that this back yard variance be grailted upon presentation of no <br />? objection letters frcm notified neighbors, particularly those neighbors ir_ the <br />back. iviotion seconded b7 "tJirs. Eian and unan3znously approved.