|
7. Appellant : Mr. Alf red B1ase, 22981 Stonc.ybrook Drive, N. Ulmsted, U.
<br />:Ref: Request to build a porch at nori:h side of house. Proposed
<br />porch v-idates Goning Ordinance 62-33 of the City of NOrth
<br />Olmsted, Chapter 1161, suU-chapter 1161.01, Minimum Side Yard
<br />ltiidths, page 41, which stipula-tes that the sum of the two sides
<br />shall not be less than 15 feet.
<br />Ntr. Blase iiidicated two possible locations for the porch, with different
<br />disi:ances from the lot line for eaciz. Mr. Greene moved to grant the
<br />application calling for a variance of two feet, instead of the five-foot
<br />variance. Mr. Schaaf seconded. The vote was unanimous.
<br />8. i-1ppellant: Hennie Homes 13uildinb Co., 4402 West 215 Street, Fairuiei-v
<br />Park 26, Ohio.
<br />Ref: Request for Corner Lot Setback variances on Sublots 14, 15, 50
<br />and 51 IvIitchell Drive, which vielates Zoning vrdinance 62-33 of
<br />the City of North Ulmsted, Section 1161.01.
<br />Eippearing for I-Iennie Homes was Rire ltichard Puzzitello an` o-therse The
<br />discussion pertaininb to the requested. variances on four corner lots
<br />indicated the need for a subsequent reauest for siriilar variances on
<br />additioxial corner lots 3, 172 18 and 45. Nir. Greene moved to grant the
<br />variances en the four lots originally indicated. [vire Schaaf second.ec?.
<br />Nir. Byers indicated that anyone Uuying the adjoinzng lots nexi to numbers
<br />14, 15, 50 and 51 be notified of the variancesm The Hennie represen-tatives
<br />concurredm The motion was approved unanimously.
<br />9. rlppellant: Nir. Spartico DiBerieditto, 23203 Lorain Rd., No. Ulmsted, 0.
<br />Ref : Niixed Use area va.r_iance involvIn7 parcel 236-18-10 Kennedy
<br />Ridge Rde Noo Ulmsted, Ohio consisting of 5.76 acres, as shoLVn
<br />in County P12t 13oolce Request is in violation of Ordinance
<br />62933, section 1202.01
<br />ik4r. DiBeneditto did not appear at -the meetingp nor did he have a repre-
<br />sentative. Niore than a dozen interes-ted pe.rsons tnrere present to express
<br />their opposition to the variance rerAuest. Several of thetn expressed keen
<br />disappointmeiii: that hir. DiBeneditto failed to appear, causing thcm to
<br />disrupt tizeir personal routines, Mr. Greene moved to disiniss the appeal
<br />of iN1r. Dil3eneditto on the grounds of insufficient information and- his
<br />absence. i?ir. Sc'tzaaf secended, and tiie vote was unanimous.
<br />10, ilppellant: Bruscino Development, Inc., 15411 Chatfield r-,ve., Cleveland
<br />Ohio.
<br />Ref : Rear Yard SeiUack variance request oi7 subiots in ivianning
<br />CaripUe11 Subdivision 78, Section 1 as followso
<br />#13, 19, 20, 21, 22 Favan Drive.
<br />#j9,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,54,56 Chase Dxive
<br />;?63,70,74,75,78,83,85 Deerfield Drive
<br />ReQUest is in violation of Loniizg Urdinance 62-33, Chapter
<br />1163, sub-paragraph 1163.01.
<br />No representative of Bruscino Development was present, ivir. Scnaaf moved
<br />to dismiss the appeal on the basis of failure to aUpear. Mr. Green
<br />3
|