Laserfiche WebLink
Page 4., Odtober 139 1965 <br />Board of Zoning Appeals <br />utilize land due to unusual angle of Elmhurst Dra Pirso Bian' member of the Board <br />resides on Elmhursto She said Elmhurst has only 40 ft. dedicated right-of way. <br />• Tryi.ng to turn into Elmhurst from Lorain presents difficulties. Driveway from <br />proposed build.itir 1.ot would be too close to Lorain and present driving hazard. <br />She sv.ggested the owner of lot deed or grant to city 5 ft. For i?Tlder roadway, <br />in order to eZiminate some of hazards. <br />Mrs. Margareta Schwab., 29509 Lorain Rd.' was present and objected to possible <br />drivir}; difficulties from congestion. <br />Mr. Snead said if building would be moved west 51, no firewall needed on east <br />side of buiZdingm Mr. Greene said if this was reason f or request for variance9 <br />this fact should have been stipulated in the request, The builder said reasons <br />for variance were only those aforementioned, T'irewall had already been figuxed <br />in the planse <br /> <br />On examm3ning plans it Vras noted there were 3 spaces allottea for parallel parking <br />on westerly side yarda Movang Uuilding west 51 would of necessity eliminate one <br />space and make diificu].t any twu way driviiig on west side oi building if any <br />cars were parked tl7eres <br />Z'he lot is 120,74 at front ard 137' at setback. On property which is adjacent <br />to east are tl?ees which would cut off view of store at extreme east end of build- <br />ing. By movin; building west 51 this would help situation but in measuring, it <br />was determined that tl-p- trees would still block view somewhato This reason was <br />not included in request ior variance as presented. <br />questionwas asked regarding retail and service traffic exiting on Elmhurst. <br />Mr. Leslie Macs was present and said this depth was sTithin the commercial <br />zoned area. <br />T,'Ir. Greene9 on the basis of the reasons submitted on the appeal9 moved to deny <br />the request for variance. Second by 17r. Byers. Vote was unanimous. <br />Mr. IS].inite sugges-ted that Mrs. Eian could contact the I4ayor., could have a <br />petition signed by residents, or appear bef'ore the Safety Committee of the <br />Counci]., to ask that safety measures be taken to avoid accidents which trould <br />result if building proceeds as nov, planned. <br />11. Appellant: Mr. Frank Loclmer, 3918 Clague Iid., Nor-t,h i?lmsted <br />Reia ?quest for variance '-i?o build proposed house on S/L 13? Cottonvaood <br />Trail Subdivi.sion, Dover Road9 which would have a 35' rear yard <br />setbackm Request is in violation of Section 1163.019 which requires 50' <br />rear yard setbackg <br />Ivir. Loclmer an.d Mr. Jatnes McEntee, builder, tirere present, I?lr. Lochne-r otans all <br />lots surroundinF; this lot. Lot measures 88, x 15a1 a I7epth of home to be built <br />-with attachea garage, measures 501. House to be built on S/L 14 has been sold <br />and owner has no objection. to the granting of '-uhis variancee iv1x. Greene moved <br />to grant the variance, not to exceed 151, on S/L 13 CottonWaod Trailo Second <br />by T•-Zr. Byers m Vote was unanamous. <br />12. Ke s Hennie Home s,4402 W. 215th Ste , 1' airv.i.ew Park. Fresent ; Ivlr, Richard <br />? Fuzzitiello ancl TZr. Frank Nloss <br />P1r, Gundy requested a clarification by the Board of the minu-Les of September 179 <br />1963 ana JulY 7' 19659 as -to the total amount of variance granted for the con- <br />struction of the building on S/Z 8 Arlington, as per plansa It was the opinion <br />, <br />?