|
I,iinutedg Board o.f Zoning Appeals., rebruary 2p 1966
<br />page 2
<br />would do litt3e to direet traffic to the subdivi.sion. Mrs. Eian moved to den,y
<br />the variance dSecond by I4r. Byers,, Vote tifas unanimous,
<br />• 3. Appellant: Mro Max Solomon., nforth Park Homes ?nc,' 5316 Idarrensvi.lle Ctr.,
<br />Cleveland
<br />Lefe Nequest to build a home with attached garage on S/L la corner Camellia
<br />P
<br />Lane and Porter Rdm Zot is of triangular shape i-rith frontage of 1601,
<br />west lot line, 159.57' 'and. east lot ].ine, 225.971. Appellant is re-
<br />quest3.ng a fron-t yard setback of 301 for garage portion of home on7.y.
<br />Requast is in violation of Section 1159.01., which requires 50, front
<br />yard setback,
<br />N;r. Max Solomon was present. Neighbors present included Yir, and lZrs. Stanley
<br />Waby9 Mr. and ITrs. R. S. Janshesltz, klr. U. S. Santell., t!ir. Clarenee Moore' all
<br />of Carnellia Lane; Nlro Edward Goodrow? N1ro Robt. Becker9 PIr. John I,eveskas, Mr.
<br />JosO Timco, all of Porter Rdo
<br />iqr. dansheski _e1t 501 setback should bs maintained in order to have houses
<br />lined up, 111r. Timco said he felt -the sma11 wedge shaped lot was too small for
<br />a sizeable houseo Tlessrs. Beckers. Santel.l and Moore voiced their objection.
<br />1-ir. Wagy's home., which is adjacent to the west' is 6Oi- 7 ft, from the east side
<br />1ine. He felt placi,ng oi this home only 5fte from side line would be too close
<br />to his home o
<br />14r, pTangana. Se1-t the 50 f-t. setback should be maintained to keep street appearance
<br />unazorm and objected to oversize house on the sma11 lotc, Pire Scheeff asked Ilir.
<br />Solomon if adjus-tments could be made in the house. He felt that because of the
<br />neighbors' objeetions the Board could not pass on the house plan as presented.
<br />.After considerable discussion as to placement and size of house which this lot
<br />could take., Mr. Sol.omon ti,ri.thdrew his applica'Vion for variance« He plans to re-
<br />design a home which will better fit the 1ota
<br />4. Appellante Matherson B1dg. Co., 23560 Lorain Rd.,-North Olmilteda
<br />Bef s Request for permit to bui.ld a home for Mx°s. Zydia Casmer, 3619 14. Park
<br />Dr,' C1eveland, Ohio, on S/L 172' which is located on the corner of
<br />Porter Rd..9 and Northern Ave„., A?orth Olmstede This corner lot is 40'
<br />wideo Proposed home is 24' x42'o Appellant is requesting a 11' set°
<br />back to proposed eztension of Northern Avea This does not conform with
<br />Code as set fo-rth in section 1159.023 which states the minimum setback
<br />on the street upon which the sid.e of the house faces shall be 251 0
<br />Mr. Greene stated this iias the third appeal for a permit to erect this home' the
<br />requests presdnt-ed June 9., 1964 and September 15, 1965, to the Board of Zoning
<br />Appeals, having been denied by the Board,
<br />Nlr. Nooclleman of the TvTa;,therson Coa said he had met -k1th the k7ayor9 also the
<br />planning Comir,ission9 with the idea tlzat Northern xve a might be vaca-ced, thereby
<br />enabling the appellant to ancrease width of loto Upon learn?ng that it mill not
<br />be vacated9 he came baclc to the Board of Zonirig Appeals. He lrnew he had the
<br />alternative of sui.ng the City in couix't but b,rished not to do so9 believing that
<br />inasmuch as the sublot was recorded prior to ordinance char?,es limiting sidE-
<br />• 7.ine setbacks9 the owner of this lot has a right to buildm
<br />giro Ivlangani felt this was a hardship casee Council was advised by the City
<br />Engzneer that Northex°n shou7.d be held dedicated as a possible future street to
<br />the HIgh School propertym inas-,qch as the owner cannot enlarge lot, he felt
|