Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes, Bnard of Zoni ng Appea?,s <br />.Tune 1., 1966 Page 3 <br />Neighbors present were; Miss Carol Fxoehlich, Mro and Mrso JoYn Cernanec, <br />4945 Porter and Mr0 and NIrs. Loom;.s., 27473 Pfzi1i xa. <br />Miss Froehl.ich said tahen she sold this property'. she was misinformed. SYe <br />understood a home was to be built for an executive connected w ith the nursing <br />home. She objecteed to tzJO apartment buildi-ngs beang built on a lot measuring <br />only 101.96 by 197.48 on east and 217031 on west lot lineo <br />Mrs. Eian stated that according to survey made in 1962 of sanitary sewer <br />capacity, maximum was set at 18 unitcs per acre, Accordirg to area of this <br />lot2 onT,y 5 unitis could be bui.].ta <br />Mro Schesf.f moved the variance be deniedo Second by Mrs, Eian. UnanimousZy <br />passed. <br />Jre' 24857 Chase Dre., 1Vorth 0lmsted <br />6, Appellantt Mro William M. Sxna.th. <br />Request for variance to build a garage attached to ho}iie. <br />Distance to lot line wi.11 be 71. Tota1 sides9 121. Re- <br />quest is in viol.ation of Section 1151e01' which requires <br />dwPlling wi-th attached garage .have totaZ sidelines of 151, <br />the minimum width., on one side' not le ss than 52. <br />1Ire Smith stated existing 82 drive is 31 from side of houseo In order to line <br />up with garage door a 31 variance is needed;: also, he desires a 131 wide garagP. <br />He sai.d neianbor to the east, NIx', I'aul Zuster, told him he would have no objectionv <br />"114rs. Hii an moved to gx°ant the 3' 3fiarianceo Second by Nlro Nelson. Motion passedo <br />7. Appellarat: Mx°. William B. pate., 29568 St,°iiart Drive2 North O:imst,ed <br />RBquest for variance to build a home at 6256 5urrey Drive <br />(corner Surrey and Cambridge) which will be 23t from front of <br />home to side lot line on 'Cambtidge, and 171 from rear of hom2 <br />to Cambridge., Reql.zest is for 21 variance at iront of home to <br />side lot 1i.ne and Sa variance from rear of home to sidc; lot li.ne. <br />Recluest is in violation of Section 1159002, zihi.ch requires m3n- <br />imttm setback on the street upon which the side of the house <br />faces shall be 251. <br />Lot is 751 wide' wider on the curve. In order -to maintain 509 setback from <br />Surrey., variance is needed, 1'Ira Pat,e said thelte was not a model that Bould <br />be bui.lt on corner 3:ots and still maintai.n the 251 sideline setback. P4re <br />Nelson moved that the variance be granted. Second by Mro Scheeff. Motion <br />passed.o <br />The Iawson Milk Coa heari.nge postponed from the May)?4' 1966 meeting, wi11 be <br />cnntinued until further dsvelopments with regaxd to reaonirg, Case is being <br />reviewed by the Planning Com.mission. Ivire Nelson moved to continue the hear- <br />ingp Second by Mro gcheeff. NIoti.on passed. <br />Plee ting ad j oux°ned at 10:20. <br />F i iam Breene yZna irman <br />e en k'. Corey?? TSecl y <br />t