09/07/1966 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1,11inutes9 Board of 7oning Appea3.s Page 3 September 79 1966 exception of an o].der one9 were set :back 509 0 !bar of property is vacant 1and9' going back to McYenzie. ivIro Scheeff made a motion that t he • variance be granted. Second by 1,7r. Nelsonm Motion passedo 66 Appellant: Carpenter I-Iomes, Inc.9 P.4m36, N•Riciget'ille' Ohio tceque st for variance to build a home at 5941 Decker Rdo, North O1m5ted, -Rquest is i'or 10t rear yard variance, re- sulting in 401 rear yard setbacko 'Depth of lot9 140e. Request is in violation of Section 1163.01' which re- quires a 50, rear yard se-tbacko T++Iro Carpenter asked that the request for variance be withdraTpm. 7. Appellant: Philip Incorvaia' 4428 Oak Lane, North 01mied Request for variance to build a detached garage which wi11 be 151 from house. '?eg,uest is a.n violation of Section 1151,,04 Sub C, which requires a detached garage to be so located that no part of same sha11 be within 201 of a dwelling on the sasne lot o-r any adj acer_t lot' or within 51 of any property line on the lot on which the same is 1ocated.e I4re Incorvaia said home is located on U.portion of Qak I,are. Depth of 1ot and rear widtl%, is 11a.7.1a F'ron-t and side is curve0 Appellant favored attacha.:n.g garage but h.ome does n.ot 1end itself to attached aarage. By placing garage 5' from rear lot lin.e ancl 25 @ from sid.e street on the curve, it i-Tould be 15' from house. Adjoining neighbor9 Mrs. Russon., phoned City Ha11 c;u.estioning placement of garage0 Upon learning that it would be placed on side of 1.ot -wn.. th entrance to side street, and not p7.aced on the lot so as to be close to their line' she had no objectionm k7r. byers moved to g'rant the v.ariance oi 51 in distance from house to garage. Second by ivIr. Tdelson. Motion passed. 8. Appellant: Jehn P. La11y' 5975 s. i orter ..`'d., North Olmsted Reaues-c for variance to build a home on Pe-rmo Parcel #235-14-20 Bux'ns ?.-?d,, Appellant is req_uesting a 21 varian.ce in rear y-ard setback. Reques i, is in violation of Section 1163e012 wh?ch requires 50f rear yard setbacke Tqrs. Zal1.y was present. Lot is 78' x 128,47 deep, i-r. Kraft, 5990 L'urns Rd. was present. He had no objection. Mr. Byers moved to grant the variance, Second by llIr. Scheeff. Yiotion passed. 9. Appellant: Carl H. -?,, Ruth E. Grasse-r, 6518 TvIapleYmrst !dr.,rT.O. liequest for variance to add llt x 13' screened-in porch to rear of home. }3ecause lot is pie-shaped, rear y-ard setback is now 39' oW?-'?? ??dition of porch, depth of rear yard on that portion of home would be 280,, tLequest is i_n triolation of Section 1163,419 which requires 501 • rear yard setbac;.,