Laserfiche WebLink
Jan?ary 259 1966 m Page 7 <br />Mr. Arnolc? ??? ???th his tIka?????? that this would not be a <br />precedent a?? ??atthere'are othc?? ???eL????? ?? ????? Olmsted <br />w1?o ha?? ?ad ???la? situai??ons, setting £c?th as ar? ?xamp71e9 <br />with a brochure9 tha? ?f Jefferson PYact?_,s He stated 'tha? <br />th??? plans for 11(wn' Hoaases BO wc??? similar to thr??? ?? ?ef????on <br />P lacea <br />?? was furtEaer stated to the representa?? ??? ?? ??cisi?? Rc?alty <br />.Phat t?.ere w?,s other l?,?nc? availabls in Nor+??a Olr?ss?ec? fu? ?he con- <br />????????? ?? ??artmentso <br />Cft"rmaa? ??okasy:,movec? tha? the request from Prc?????ion Realty to <br />r??one the ?ea? ?????pns of tYn? parceAs ac?jacent to Ranchva,ew on <br />the north side of Lorain from reside?tial ?? ?pa-rtment be dlenied <br />bc?cause the l?? can sti11 be develm??? ???????y as resident3a,1, <br />.. .a_N,-P/`?d tkaere are suffs,cient ?.reas presently zonc?d £or ?.paar?ntuse <br />,.,. ,: <br />?hat are not as yet c???eloped. Mr. 5palc??? ??conded the ffiotioxa. <br />Mr. Esga? ?ommented as . ?o whether or be in o-rder to <br />h??? this ??ning request forwarded :?onal Placnr??ag Conm <br />a?issioa? £or eons?.deratio?s in tk?eir u1?????tion of the <br />??raan 1toac? zoning i? ??e Master P71arei <br />Caairman Prokasy B s m?tion being madeAfi&5duly secondec? ? was put <br />to a ???e anc? ca?tiec? unanimously by-::,t'Members present, <br />IV Mr. Kanareff, E?gineer for Lake City 1-and Developments mac?? the <br />presentation., prof???ing p1?t maps. ?e a1so stated theg? were <br />p???enting the Sa'nds Su`???vision in ???? subda???sionse three of <br />which were `??ing presented at this meeting. ?? ?tated that City <br />?ouncib ????ov?? ??? ??elaminaries and the fin?? ????? ??e noa <br />before the P1anning Commi?sion. <br />Mre Kanareff stated that Subdivision I was tfl?? ???aight? ''street, <br />Subdivision 2 were the streets a?ear• Canterbu??? ???division 3 is <br />Lydgatt an?1 F°iel¢1?g9 and Subdivisi? 4 is the c?ul-de-sac, ?uhich <br />:'??'?as not available- At this s???tiuag& and is not in fiffial form. <br />lb? composite was sfl?own iffi orde? that it woul? ?e made more clear <br />to the Members of the ?omissa,on. Mr. Kanareff statec? there a,re <br />app??ximately s???? and-amhalf.acres set aside f?? the City ia? <br />the ??????? ??ning8 a??? three andmamhalf actes nott inclu?ed in <br />t-h? ?lu???? zoni?? whic&? would be us?d as a ?rivate recreational <br />siteo <br />F??ther dis???si? was?h?? ?elative to the in????? and egress <br />factorsm Mr. Sand stated there was a1so provided an access to