02/08/1966 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

February 8, 1966 - Page 11 of .-the above -mc??tiaLmc?? ?????entse "Thank you for your k?.?c? ???sLdlarat:Lan. I ama asVery `rruly Yo,Ilrs9 e? te??l F. J. ?razdilc, ? CommuII1:21??tionso Ckaairman I'rokasy indicated tr,?er,?:,, waru ?;???icati?s fr? the A?ayor, St?,te H?,g?aw?=r ???????,?? ?c?? locat3on of Route ?'?.2. Ch?irman ProR?.asy statc?? that ther? has bc?en-a reqa??? ?ha? the hi?hway dc?partment avoid the Job?n Knox parceIl as uruch ?? ???si??? and there were two alignmea?? ?tuc???? su?mitteda The Highway Departm ment moved9 bn Sch??e 1e??? ?oad 20 feeta in Scheme 2 9 the alternate alignment studya they moved iit 10 feet9 which 3? ?bou? the extr,er?? ?? which ?? can be movedo Chairman Pr?ka?? ?eac? a letter da??d January 26a 1966 and also a 1etter to Revs Blasius un???? saw datee Chairman P??kasy in¢flicated that thesc? ?etters referred to the first renderinge ???e h?r, a??? ???? a l???s-r da.ted February 7 from the Deg???tmc??? ?f H???ways addressed. _ to the Mayors Chaa.a.rman I'rokasy statec? the ??sidents of Root Roac? whose parcels ia???????? will.undaubtedl? ?e benefited because the lots in the a??? ???? ?e i? the nea?gh????ood of 500 to 600 fe?? ???p an? ??uld have pa??el? th?? ?ouldbc? subcdivided facing b'oth streetsa Meffibers of the Johmm b??? ?????h indi????? that the a1ter- nate schem? ? would he a wc??kable. plan and urged tk e Commissimn to support Scheme 2. Mro Esgar movea? that--upoa? the ??commendation of Rev. Blasius, and Messrsa ????bury aiac? Milb?? the Plannin? Comission approve 5cheffie #29 ?????nate Ali???en? Study for State Itoaate 252 Relocation da??d F??ru?ry 79 1966 `?e approved, Mrm LaPonza se?onded its Ni?tion put to a vc??e as f???owso"Yeas89, Spaldings Muisiala LaPonza9 P??kasy Forda.. Esgara Fabeke . ;/(b) Jarau??? ?uildin? ??partment Report w??? ?t in the rec?rd. The P??ning Work Ps???ram fc?? Urban Planni?? ?????tance, City of North 0lmsted9 ?????ga (bun?? was p?t in the record.