My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/08/1966 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1966
>
1966 Planning Commission
>
02/08/1966 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:36:38 PM
Creation date
1/31/2019 9:21:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1966
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
2/8/1966
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
F?br-aaxy 8e 1966 ? Pagc? ? <br />Under Golfva??? Subdi-visiona correct the spelling of <br />eBSot-um?-cohBQ tO BOS-tm;o-x-c°h0" <br />?? ???? ???? under e????????? ?????ts"9 paragraph-V11a <br />??????t the spelling of to. dsYi-omhmreB and, <br />to <br />Page ten9 ??ragraph c??ght9 ??? ?0oure ??????t "Sumit <br />County Road studyee to. 117oCi???? ?oad studyoPA <br />The ffiinu-tes were then app?,?ovad as carrect@do <br />Mro F0Tc? Mac?6 queery as tc? ??e advisa`?il??? ?? the w?rd- <br />in? in t`?? ??????? ?elative to spc?cific a?????? th???in <br />??th rc?gard to mutions beiLmg passec? ?? the Boardo <br />Mro Kitchen, Law Director9 advis(sc? t-he Commissio? that <br />the ?in???? ?houlc? ?ead the"yeasee and `????s" voted by <br />unameo 0ld Ba??iness 4 <br />(a) ????cal ReaA?? atedo <br />Cha,irman Prokasy advised that this had been in comittee <br />f?? ????? ??aiting re???? ???? ??? ???te, Highway-Dem <br />pa??ment? in ??gards to location o? Routs 252- ?and s-tatedl <br />h? ???????d two revi?ions of pl?s which in?lic?ates the <br />relocation goi?ng tk????gh the property uf Med???l R?altya <br />?? ????? k1so.. ?????? ?ha? the Counci? ???viously <br />requestec? the higkaway be built along the li??? ?? ??? <br />?????????y resubmitted-rab(ocatiot? pl?s and tkaere- ???e <br />had c??????sio?? wi?? thp- 5tate Higfl???? ????rtment9 City . <br />??ini??ratione and John Knox Church o - <br />Ckaairman P??ka?? ????? th?? ??? ????sLon c???? the re-., <br />????? ??? ???????? ? ?? ??? ?ear po??ion of Medic?al ??al?? <br />??????ratec? ?????????? ? ???ein Roa? ???? ???t R?ads. <br />Mra LaPoffiza secondec? the m?tiono The motion <br />8lyeasBB ?y <br />and Fabeko <br />????? ???y mac?? ??d -seconc??? ??s put,to a voteo <br />sSpa.&dinga::.MugialflLaS odnza9 Prokasy8 dS' ord9 E?gar <br />(b) Golfview Subdivisiono <br />Mra Musial stateda in co?sidering the rcvisec? ???limina?? <br />????? submitted by Mra Eauc?ro it was the Comittes° s• opinion
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.