My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/08/1966 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1966
>
1966 Planning Commission
>
02/08/1966 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:36:38 PM
Creation date
1/31/2019 9:21:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1966
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
2/8/1966
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. <br />? <br />. <br />Fe??uary 8, 1966 - Page 4 <br />aMrm ???ia? ??ved ???? the Pl?nn???? ???????on disapprove <br />t1?? ??eliminary ?lan prc??ented fo? ??? ?eason tl'r??t tt-a <br />School Board is interested isa thLs sgte for a schooJ6; <br />secondec? ?y Mro Fabake <br />Chairman Prokasy further comented that at the Joint <br />M??ting of the Scb??ol 1?oard9 ?ounc?ila and Pb?ning Com- <br />mLssiona Mr. Mohr stated they were proceec???g immea1iately <br />on acquisition of the property in questione <br />Mro Bauer.?tated fl?? had occ????on ?? ???? ???h Mro Storch <br />before ??? ???? ?oi?g m???ingo He ind?cated to Mra Stc??ch <br />1?? ??d a? ??tion on. the pxoperty aLmd asked of their ianten- <br />tions before he, Mre: ?????? ??tarted expending munies in <br />order to subc?????? the land accorcdli?? ?? the ?lannin,? Cam- <br />miss3,?n and Council°s rulinge ' <br />Mra Bauer stated Mro .-- S tarch infu??? him ths Schoob Board. <br />didn e t` h ?,?? ??a? ?ao?ey-appropriai?ed fur th?.s spec?if?,c? pl??;?.c? <br />of land; however9. there wa? ????? ?? ?? ? budget meeta??g <br />in ???uary last-of -the Schoob Boarc? where a ????ain amount <br />of ffi???? woulc? ?e a??????????? ?? ?nable theffi to:?????? <br />?????in funds f?? ????ain parc?else <br />It was his belief tha? ther? ??s a????ximately $100,000 <br />appropriatecd but not ablocatec? ??r a?? pa???????? ????ele <br />Mro Baa??? fu????? ?tated he asked Mro 5torch e???? ?? could <br />f?????? ??? and. Mro ????ch immc??cated there wa? ?? ????? <br />?? purchasc? ???? ???ticullar piece o£ property?, . <br />Mr e Bauer indicated Mro Stc??ch asked him to give terms <br />so as to eanable the School Board to purc?ha?? the ??????tya <br />ancd the Sckaoob ??? ??? ? ?? dates ??plied wit?h ang??hi?? <br />????????????? ?n mind. <br />Mr a ????? ????ed ?that he would prefer to ????tiatc? ?? the <br />???????? ??th?? than. enter into ?y litigationo According <br />to Mra Bauera Mr. Storct? ???ormc c? him before tYa? ? ???? <br />??????? ???? ?? ????? ??? ?? ?? ??????? ?? ??e any type <br />of offer. and c??dn°t have mvney to buy the pro????y anc? <br />???? ?? ?????? ?o aheac? ???? ??? ?lanso <br />C?airman Prokasy in ' dLcated9 upon reviewing the ???ter of <br />Mre Starch, that intc???????d i? ?? ???ni?? ???y must <br />have the f???? ??aLlable to make the acguisi??on.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.