Laserfiche WebLink
??bruaxy 8a ???? ? ?agc? ? <br />su?divisiona If the alne;?? ?? ??e lot?? ?Aavc? ?ot been <br />reduced below 13e200 aq?????e fl!eet9 it doesn°? enter into <br />,. the cabculatione <br />Mro ?abas abso inc??????? ???? ????????s dic? ??? ????r <br />into the calc??lationss M. Ka;saafeff further discusssc? <br />??? ??tLrioc? ?? ????? the .dc??eloper calcub???d ard- subse- <br />c??????y ma?? ??ther pre l?inary showi;?g the fab1 use <br />of the 1and with 80-fuot lotse ??vi?? ?h(a develog??r a <br />??? ??in of 35 botse whic?? ???y multiplied by the sc????? <br />??????? ?? ??????? ?ots less the 15 per cc??t and addec? <br />the ???ult o£ seven.andm??half acrc so " <br />The La? Director exp21ain(ed the Ordinanceo Mro Kanareff <br />??dicated he would. ???? ?? ??? th_c? ?????an-ce remc??afted <br />from the stamc????nt ' uf guidance to the ???? ??gLnear9 an¢? <br />the ??????? ???igiser9 and to tFn? ????siono <br />Mre Esgar askc?? ?? the ?an? ???? ??? ??ange but whc?ther <br />there wou1d? ?e an? ??????s made to subc?iv??ions one9 twoa <br />?? ?????? ?? ??????tl? ????ented. Mre Sands indicated <br />he did not thisak tY???? would beo The only c?hangc? w(oulc? <br />?e in the fourth subr??vis'iOno <br />Mre E?gar tT??n mac?? ? ??ti?? that the P.la????? Comission <br />accept for p???ting purpo??? ?ands Subdi?.?isionas Nose 1 8 <br />?, and 3 as corrected since the last a??????? ???? ??? <br />City Eaagineer calcuRatc? the a?ea required td be deeded to <br />the C??y unc??? the`??????? ???elopmenta <br />Mro Ford seconded the-motion. Mre <br />if the a?????? ???cula??? ?? ???e <br />acres9 the l¢??? would be re-ffioved <br />shifted c?own so i? ?oulc? ???tir??? <br />piece to be deeded to the City and <br />recreatimna <br />Kanareff indicated9 <br />?han sevc?n andmaah??f <br />and the cubmc?e'-sac <br />to be a rec?tangul?? <br />????? the a?ea o£ <br />Mre Esgar in?????? ??hp- Commm???ion the ??? ??????l(e c????? <br />?n his mind wa? ??????r a piece of property would ara??? <br />that woubd.be left, over wYni?? ?oullc? ??? have a conf??????on <br />???table to the City but saw a?? ???lihooc? that the p????cum <br />Yar portion o€ the subc????sion woub? ha?? ?? ?? changed in <br />ord?? ?o make up tIl?? ????? landa <br /> <br />Mre Sands inc??????? that wh?n the ?lans r???? ?riginally drawn <br />tfl??y did not ha?? th? ???????sac and gart of tka? land they