02/22/1966 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

??bruary 22a 1966 Page 4 ? _.. ?ai?n Pxokasy ffioved. tu ????tLaus the Wk=-tftsrn Las?Id DeveR,opers° pxopo??l in Comb???? until recc???t of fia??? ??- poIS'l? ??? ??giot[?al ?lanning Cokmq zg2;on9 ??condec? ?y Mro ???pnza.o Motion put to a voteo ?eas9 Musi?.?ba and Fabsko IV NEW DEVELOPMEPJ? AND-SLMD II SIo! PROPOo SALSo (a) Bl???? ?and fo? Sandy 1?id.Ae #3a Ch???an P?????? ??plainec? thesc? ???e lots on Dovex Center Road submitted as w ?r???teT_type in an "Aoa ????? ??ea9 rec?????ing 70m???t l??s numbering b29a He statcd tk?? ?ypical A,ot w'Lc?th and dept1? was 70 x 155m Mro ??nareff stated tknat they waTe approachin? ???s de- vebopmen? ?s a c?luster-devebopmnt basis wii-rT.? over 100 lc??s and the acreage to be dlona * tec? wouLd b(a determined by tlzc? City E?gin??? and would be the ?am loc??tion as. the Laip-d deeded for Sandy Ri??e #29 tku? ?? ?? ?ller paxc?el nr??? ?????? ?oada .? Mre ??dl&asy ga?inted oii?t that the streeus make a circu`,Iar ? . pattern with onl? ??? en?rance and exit fu? the ??tLrt? sub- di????ono 'Mro Kanareff statec? that the deptb. ?? the oval lots was 509 €??t and since the restxiction on Boven Road was 500 feeta they bough? ??????hing beyond that pointe ?? orc??? ?? ?aive the reatTic?tione t'??y had to i?? all the bacfl? ????? ?? ??l the lots9. making the lots deepc?? ?han the mLnimm 155 feeta The thxc?? ????s are abc?t 1778 fec?t and 175 £eete Mro Kanareff als0 ???t(ed the arc??? ?o be donated to the ???? wa? ?pp????aly fo?r and-a,-habf ac-geso .. Ct?ai?n Prokasy indicated in TBSPonsa to a queTy of Mra Musial as to.??? ?????? ?? ????????? Land to be donated in anotk??? si?? ? that in a phonce conversati.s?? with ??? ??airm man of . the Plannin?? ?????ece of Ccrosncib9 he indicatec? ? interest s,n expandi?? size of the ???eage to the parcal adja° cent..tO the ??su???t acrc???e frcrm Sand? ?idge #2e Mro ????al indLeated ttiat the dcvelopments were beca?in? concentratec? ??th hoansi?? wi?? viTtuably no recrc??tional faeil- ities except what might p'ossibR,y bc ?? thi? ???tic?ular piece I of 1and0 He,expressedl the opinion t`??? th? ?Lann2??? Comis- sion was periaps n?? ?????m'Lng the c2,uater-oco»i?? oLpdlinance correctly.